IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cgd/wpaper/524.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Revisiting Aid Effectiveness: A New Framework and Set of Measures for Assessing Aid "Quality"

Author

Listed:
  • Caitlin McKee

    (Center for Global Development)

  • Catherine Blampied
  • Ian Mitchell

    (Center for Global Development)

  • Andrew Rogerson

    (Center for Global Development)

Abstract

This paper revisits the concept of international development aid effectiveness and its measurement as part of a review of the Quality of ODA (QuODA) assessment published regularly since 2010. The paper takes stock of the current state of evidence and consensus on the principles of aid effectiveness; reviews potential measures; and proposes a revised framework for QuODA, to quantitatively measure indicators of aid quality at the single-agency level, including both bilateral and multilateral actors.

Suggested Citation

  • Caitlin McKee & Catherine Blampied & Ian Mitchell & Andrew Rogerson, 2020. "Revisiting Aid Effectiveness: A New Framework and Set of Measures for Assessing Aid "Quality"," Working Papers 524, Center for Global Development.
    • Handle: RePEc:cgd:wpaper:524
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cgdev.org/publication/revisiting-aid-effectiveness-new-framework-and-set-measures-assessing-aid?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muhammad A Ingratubun & Akhmad Fauzi, 2021. "Opening the Black Box: Disbursement Delays Impacts on Growth in Asian Development Bank Loan Projects in Indonesia," ConScienS Conference Proceedings 029mi, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.
    2. Terence Wood & Sabit Otor & Matthew Dornan, 2022. "Why are aid projects less effective in the Pacific?," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(3), May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Aid; Allocations; Assessment; Effectiveness; Fragility; Governance; Indicators; Learning; Ownership; Transparency; Tying;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O2 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cgd:wpaper:524. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publications Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cgdevus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.