Evidence suggests that a surprisingly large fraction of firms comply with pollution emission standards even though expected penalties for noncompliance are low. We offer an explanation of this puzzle by extending the standard model of enforcement to include a self-reporting requirement and enforcement power. These extensions are enough to overturn the conventional result that higher fines lead to higher compliance rates. Specifically, under plausible conditions, higher compliance rates are achieved with lower fines for noncompliance. In addition, the cost of enforcing a given level of aggregate pollution is then minimized by setting the fine for noncompliance equal to zero.
Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by CESifo GmbH in its series CESifo Working Paper Series with number
CESifo Working Paper No. 120.
Find related papers by JEL classification: D62 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Externalities D82 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Asymmetric and Private Information L51 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Economics of Regulation
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)