IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdf/wpaper/2018-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

TThe Discount Rate Debate and Its Implications for Defined Benefit Pensions

Author

Listed:

Abstract

While the Universities Superannuation Scheme recently reported the biggest deficit of any British pension fund, the union's actuary finds no funding crisis for the scheme. The huge contrast can be explained by the current debate on whether low gilt yields imply low future returns on other asset classes. This article argues that falling interest rates since 1980s are essentially the result of successful monetary policies to control inflation, thereby the economy benefited and firms made good profits, giving rise to healthy funding level for the scheme. Since index-linked gilt yields are found to explain up to 99% variation of its past liabilities, the scheme is likely to be in surplus if a correct discount rate is used in the valuation. The implications are that many past closures of defined benefit schemes were unwarranted, expensive disputes could have been avoided and firms' spending on such schemes are unnecessarily high.

Suggested Citation

  • Woon K. Wong, 2018. "TThe Discount Rate Debate and Its Implications for Defined Benefit Pensions," Cardiff Economics Working Papers E2018/12, Cardiff University, Cardiff Business School, Economics Section.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdf:wpaper:2018/12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://carbsecon.com/wp/E2018_12.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rostami-Tabar, Bahman & Ali, Mohammad M. & Hong, Tao & Hyndman, Rob J. & Porter, Michael D. & Syntetos, Aris, 2022. "Forecasting for social good," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 1245-1257.
    2. Jackie Grant, 2024. "The UK Universities Superannuation Scheme valuations 2014-2023: gilt yield dependence, self-sufficiency and metrics," Papers 2403.08811, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2024.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    pension; defined benefit; low interest rate; cost of guarantee; prudence;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G1 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets
    • G22 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Insurance; Insurance Companies; Actuarial Studies
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors
    • G3 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdf:wpaper:2018/12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Yongdeng Xu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecscfuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.