This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Tacit versus Overt Collusion Firm Asymmetries and Numbers: What’s the Evidence?

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Stephen Davies () (Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia)
Matthew Olczak () (Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

It is conventional wisdom that collusion is more likely the fewer firms there are in a market and the more symmetric they are. This is often theoretically justified in terms of a repeated non-cooperative game. Although that model fits more easily with tacit than overt collusion, the impression sometimes given is that ‘one model fits all’. Moreover, the empirical literature offers few stylised facts on the most simple of questions – how few are few and how symmetric is symmetric? This paper attempts to fill this gap while also exploring the interface of tacit and overt collusion, albeit in an indirect way. First, it identifies the empirical model of tacit collusion that the European Commission appears to have employed in coordinated effects merger cases – apparently only fairly symmetric duopolies fit the bill. Second, it shows that, intriguingly, the same story emerges from the quite different experimental literature on tacit collusion. This offers a stark contrast with the findings for a sample of prosecuted cartels; on average, these involve six members (often more) and size asymmetries among members are often considerable. The indirect nature of this ‘evidence’ cautions against definitive conclusions; nevertheless, the contrast offers little comfort for those who believe that the same model does, more or less, fit all.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.ccp.uea.ac.uk/publicfiles/workingpapers/CCP08-32.pdf
Our checks indicate that this address may not be valid because: 500 Can't connect to ccpweb.mgt.uea.ac.uk:80 (connect: timeout) (http://www.ccp.uea.ac.uk/publicfiles/workingpapers/CCP08-32.pdf [302 Found]--> http://ccpweb.mgt.uea.ac.uk/publicfiles/workingpapers/CCP08-32.pdf). If this is indeed the case, please notify (Cheryl Whittkaer)
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia in its series Working Papers with number 08-32.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 26 pages
Date of creation: Oct 2008
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ccp:wpaper:wp08-32

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Norwich, NR4 7TJ
Phone: +44(0)1603 593715
Fax: +44(0)1603 591622
Email:
Web page: http://www.ccp.uea.ac.uk
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Cheryl Whittkaer).

Related research
Keywords: tacit collusion; collective dominance; coordinated effects; cartels; European mergers; asymmetries; firm numbers;

Find related papers by JEL classification:
L13 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets
L41 - Industrial Organization - - Antitrust Issues and Policies - - - Monopolization; Horizontal Anticompetitive Practices

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
  1. Roberta Longo & Marisa Miraldo & Andrew Street, 2008. "Price regulation of pluralistic markets subject to provider collusion," Working Papers 045cherp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York. [Downloadable!]
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? About 1000 journals are listed on RePEc.

This page was last updated on 2009-10-30.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.