Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

The Paradox of the Exclusion of Exploitative Abuse

Contents:

Author Info

  • Bruce Lyons

    ()
    (School of Economics and Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia)

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    Monopoly pricing is a textbook market failure that is taught in the first year of any economics course. The implied welfare loss (or ‘exploitative abuse’) justifies a whole range of competition policy towards cartels, mergers and regulated industries. Yet there is widespread hostility to prosecuting the same exploitative abuse in the textbook monopoly case (i.e. under Article 82EC)! This paper seeks to understand this paradox. I conclude that, while there are important problems with prosecuting Article 82 exploitation cases (because of problems relating to measurement, market dynamics, multi-sided markets and remedy issues), it is important to keep open the possibility of prosecution; for example, in the forthcoming Article 82 Guidelines.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www.ccp.uea.ac.uk/publicfiles/workingpapers/CCP08-1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia in its series Working Papers with number 08-1.

    as in new window
    Length: 20 pages
    Date of creation: Dec 2007
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:ccp:wpaper:wp08-01

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: Norwich, NR4 7TJ
    Phone: +44(0)1603 593715
    Fax: +44(0)1603 591622
    Email:
    Web page: http://www.ccp.uea.ac.uk
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords: exclusionary abuse; exploitative abuse; monopoly pricing; welfare loss;

    Find related papers by JEL classification:

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ccp:wpaper:wp08-01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Cheryl Whittkaer) The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Cheryl Whittkaer to update the entry or send us the correct address.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.