IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cbo/report/57090.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Usage Patterns and Costs of Unmanned Aerial Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Congressional Budget Office

Abstract

For the past two decades, the Department of Defense has been selectively using unmanned aerial systems (UASs) in place of manned intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance aircraft, flying them for much longer durations, on average. UASs generally have lower recurring costs per flying hour than manned aircraft. However, comparing the life-cycle costs (including acquisition costs) per flying hour of the Air Force’s unmanned RQ-4 and the Navy’s manned P-8, CBO found that UASs’ cost advantage may not be as large when the costs of acquiring the aircraft are considered.

Suggested Citation

  • Congressional Budget Office, 2021. "Usage Patterns and Costs of Unmanned Aerial Systems," Reports 57090, Congressional Budget Office.
    • Handle: RePEc:cbo:report:57090
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cbo.gov/system/files/2021-06/57090-UAS.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • H41 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Public Goods
    • H43 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Project Evaluation; Social Discount Rate
    • H56 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - National Security and War
    • H57 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Procurement
    • L64 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - Other Machinery; Business Equipment; Armaments
    • N42 - Economic History - - Government, War, Law, International Relations, and Regulation - - - U.S.; Canada: 1913-

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbo:report:57090. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbogvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.