IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bfr/banfra/284.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Innovation and Advertising: Theory and Evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Askenazy, P.
  • Breda, T.
  • Irac, D.

Abstract

Advertising and innovation are two engines for firms to escape competition through a better attraction power toward consumers or quality advantage. We propose a model that encompasses both the static and dynamic interactions between R&D, advertising and competitive environment. This model provides two main predictions. First, for a given competitive environment, quality leaders spend more in advertising in order to extract maximal rents; thus, lower costs of ads may favor R&D. Second, more competition pushes Neck and Neck firms to advertise more to attract a larger share of consumers on their products or services. Empirical evidence from a large panel of 59,000 French firms over 1990-2004 supports these two properties.

Suggested Citation

  • Askenazy, P. & Breda, T. & Irac, D., 2010. "Innovation and Advertising: Theory and Evidence," Working papers 284, Banque de France.
  • Handle: RePEc:bfr:banfra:284
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publications.banque-france.fr/sites/default/files/medias/documents/working-paper_284_2010.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emily Fogg-Meade, 1901. "The Place of Advertising in Modern Business," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 9, pages 218-218.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cooper, Russell & Kempf, Hubert & Peled, Dan, "undated". "Insulation Impossible: Monetary Policy and Regional Fiscal Spillovers in a Federation," Working Papers WP2010/5, University of Haifa, Department of Economics.
    2. Patrick Llerena & Valentine Millot, 2013. "Are Trade Marks and Patents Complementary or Substitute Protections for Innovation," Working Papers of BETA 2013-01, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olivier Gossner & Jakub Steiner & Colin Stewart, 2021. "Attention Please!," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 89(4), pages 1717-1751, July.
    2. Philippe Askenazy & Thomas Breda & Delphine Irac, 2016. "Advertising and R&D: theory and evidence from France," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 33-56, January.
    3. Jian Xu & Feng Liu & You-hua Chen, 2019. "R&D, Advertising and Firms’ Financial Performance in South Korea: Does Firm Size Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-16, July.
    4. Emilio Calvano & Bruno Jullien, 2012. "Issues in Online Advertising and Competition Policy: A Two-sided Market Perspective," Chapters, in: Joseph E. Harrington Jr & Yannis Katsoulacos (ed.), Recent Advances in the Analysis of Competition Policy and Regulation, chapter 9, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. MANEA Laura, 2015. "The Impact Of The European Legislation On Advertising Strategies In The Field Of Food Products," Revista Economica, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 67(Supplemen), pages 285-297, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Advertising; Innovation; Competition; Lerner.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D4 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bfr:banfra:284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michael brassart (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bdfgvfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.