IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bdi/opques/qef_310_16.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Incentives and evaluation of public managers in Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Roberta Occhilupo

    (Bank of Italy)

  • Lucia Rizzica

    (Bank of Italy)

Abstract

We analyse the current structure and the most recent evolution of the legislation concerning incentives for public managers in Italy. In the light of the main findings of economic theory, we identify the most critical issues inherent to the design of an optimal system of incentives. These are the existence of multi-principle agency problems involving public managers; the difficulty of observing and measuring the output produced in the public sector; the excessive limits to managers� autonomy imposed by the need to respect the rule of law. Along these three lines, we analyse the reforms of public management that have been adopted in Italy from the nineties and evaluate their effectiveness through an empirical analysis of the premiums paid to public managers in 2012. The empirical analysis reveals a substantial flattening of the premiums paid and highlights that only the age of the manager significantly affects how much they receive. We conclude that the poor effectiveness of the current system of incentives for public managers is mainly due to the undifferentiated application of the same rules to all organizations, to an inadequate planning of the objectives and to the excessive limits to managers� autonomy.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberta Occhilupo & Lucia Rizzica, 2016. "Incentives and evaluation of public managers in Italy," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 310, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdi:opques:qef_310_16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.bancaditalia.it/pubblicazioni/qef/2016-0310/QEF_310_16.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    public sector labour markets; management; incentives;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D02 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact
    • D73 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Bureaucracy; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations; Corruption
    • J58 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining - - - Public Policy
    • K31 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Labor Law

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdi:opques:qef_310_16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bdigvit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.