IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bde/wpaper/2324.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Machine learning applied to active fixed-income portfolio management: a Lasso logit approach

Author

Listed:
  • Mercedes de Luis

    (Banco de España)

  • Emilio Rodríguez

    (Banco de España)

  • Diego Torres

    (Banco de España)

Abstract

The use of quantitative methods constitutes a standard component of the institutional investors’ portfolio management toolkit. In the last decade, several empirical studies have employed probabilistic or classification models to predict stock market excess returns, model bond ratings and default probabilities, as well as to forecast yield curves. To the authors’ knowledge, little research exists into their application to active fixed-income management. This paper contributes to filling this gap by comparing a machine learning algorithm, the Lasso logit regression, with a passive (buy-and-hold) investment strategy in the construction of a duration management model for high-grade bond portfolios, specifically focusing on US treasury bonds. Additionally, a two-step procedure is proposed, together with a simple ensemble averaging aimed at minimising the potential overfitting of traditional machine learning algorithms. A method to select thresholds that translate probabilities into signals based on conditional probability distributions is also introduced. A large set of financial and economic variables is used as an input to obtain a signal for active duration management relative to a passive benchmark portfolio. As a first result, most of the variables selected by the model are related to financial flows and economic fundamentals, but the parameters seem to be unstable over time, thereby suggesting that the variable relevance may be time dependent. Backtesting of the model, which was carried out on a sovereign bond portfolio denominated in US dollars, resulted in a small but statistically significant outperformance of benchmark index in the out-of-sample dataset after controlling for overfitting. These results support the case for incorporating quantitative tools in the active portfolio management process for institutional investors, but paying special attention to potential overfitting and unstable parameters. Quantitative tools should be viewed as a complementary input to the qualitative and fundamental analysis, together with the portfolio manager’s expertise, in order to make better-informed investment decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Mercedes de Luis & Emilio Rodríguez & Diego Torres, 2023. "Machine learning applied to active fixed-income portfolio management: a Lasso logit approach," Working Papers 2324, Banco de España.
  • Handle: RePEc:bde:wpaper:2324
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.53479/33560
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.bde.es/f/webbe/SES/Secciones/Publicaciones/PublicacionesSeriadas/DocumentosTrabajo/23/Files/dt2324e.pdf
    File Function: First version, September 2023
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.53479/33560?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    machine learning; probabilistic or classification models; Lasso logit regressions; active fixed-income management; absolute excess return; Sharpe ratios; duration management;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C45 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Neural Networks and Related Topics
    • C51 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Construction and Estimation
    • C53 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Forecasting and Prediction Models; Simulation Methods
    • E37 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles - - - Forecasting and Simulation: Models and Applications
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bde:wpaper:2324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ángel Rodríguez. Electronic Dissemination of Information Unit. Research Department. Banco de España (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bdegves.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.