IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/awl/finbri/10.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Prepaid Cards: A Case Study of Japan, the United States and the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Hiroaki Kuwahara

    (Deposit Insurance Corporation of Japan)

  • Kazuaki Hara

    (Deposit Insurance Corporation of Japan)

Abstract

Prepaid cards have a relatively long history compared to other Fintech products. Over the last half a century, prepaid cards have been issued as telephone cards, cards substituting for subway tickets, etc. Prepaid cards may broadly cover cards through which value is stored, and for which the holder has paid the issuer in advance. While this concept of prepaid cards is broader than IADI's definition of e-money, it is essential to note that respective jurisdictions/regions may have their own definitions, scope and/or concepts of e-money and/or prepaid cards. The objective of this brief is to present a case study in Japan on prepaid payment instruments stipulated in the Payment Services Act. The brief also looks into prepaid-type payment instruments issued under the legal frameworks of the U.S. and the EU. Prepaid cards have evolved together with their legal frameworks in the respective jurisdictions/regions. Differences among jurisdictions/regions are observed not only in their legal frameworks for prepaid cards, but also in the scope and concepts, similarities to deposits, impacts on depositors, functions and risks of issuing institutions, and other relevant elements concerning prepaid cards. It can be said that there is no single approach that could be applied universally for supervision and protection of prepaid cards, nor for the appropriate relationships with deposit insurance. Respective jurisdictions/regions have been developing their own approaches as appropriate in accordance with their legal frameworks and other relevant elements, including social needs. It is considered essential that a one-size-fits-all approach is not taken in considering measures for supervising and protecting prepaid cards and their appropriate relationships with deposit insurance. With all of the variations in the treatment of prepaid cards, one should begin by understanding the legal frameworks in the respective jurisdiction/regions, including their development stages and historical backgrounds, and then carefully analyse and sort out relevant elements of prepaid cards. It may also be useful to apply this approach in assessing new Fintech products that may be developed in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Hiroaki Kuwahara & Kazuaki Hara, 2022. "Prepaid Cards: A Case Study of Japan, the United States and the European Union," IADI Fintech Briefs 10, International Association of Deposit Insurers.
  • Handle: RePEc:awl:finbri:10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.iadi.org/en/assets/File/Papers/Fintech%20Briefs/Fintech%20Brief%2010%20Prepaid_Cards%20Final.pdf
    File Function: Final version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philip Keitel, 2011. "Insolvency risk in the network-branded prepaid-card value chain," Consumer Finance Institute discussion papers 11-05, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
    2. Jeannette N. Bennett, 2015. "From Coins to Big Bucks: The Evolution of General-Purpose Reloadable Prepaid Cards," Page One Economics Newsletter, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, pages 1-1, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bert Van Roosebeke & Ryan Defina, 2023. "Deposit Insurance in 2023: Global Trends and Key Issues," IADI Research Papers 23-02, International Association of Deposit Insurers.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      deposit insurance; bank resolution;

      JEL classification:

      • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
      • G33 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Bankruptcy; Liquidation

      NEP fields

      This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:awl:finbri:10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: IADI Research Unit (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iadibch.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.