IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2106.15003.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Note on the Topology of the First Stage of 2SLS with Many Instruments

Author

Listed:
  • Guy Tchuente

Abstract

The finite sample properties of estimators are usually understood or approximated using asymptotic theories. Two main asymptotic constructions have been used to characterize the presence of many instruments. The first assumes that the number of instruments increases with the sample size. I demonstrate that in this case, one of the key assumptions used in the asymptotic construction may imply that the number of ``effective" instruments should be finite, resulting in an internal contradiction. The second asymptotic representation considers that the number of instrumental variables (IVs) may be finite, infinite, or even a continuum. The number does not change with the sample size. In this scenario, the regularized estimator obtained depends on the topology imposed on the set of instruments as well as on a regularization parameter. These restrictions may induce a bias or restrict the set of admissible instruments. However, the assumptions are internally coherent. The limitations of many IVs asymptotic assumptions provide support for finite sample distributional studies to better understand the behavior of many IV estimators.

Suggested Citation

  • Guy Tchuente, 2021. "A Note on the Topology of the First Stage of 2SLS with Many Instruments," Papers 2106.15003, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2106.15003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2106.15003
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthew Harding & Jerry Hausman & Christopher J. Palmer, 2016. "Finite Sample BIAS Corrected IV Estimation for Weak and Many Instruments," Advances in Econometrics, in: Essays in Honor of Aman Ullah, volume 36, pages 245-273, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    2. Peter C. B. Phillips & Hyungsik R. Moon, 1999. "Linear Regression Limit Theory for Nonstationary Panel Data," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 67(5), pages 1057-1112, September.
    3. Carrasco, Marine, 2012. "A regularization approach to the many instruments problem," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 170(2), pages 383-398.
    4. Anatolyev, Stanislav & Gospodinov, Nikolay, 2011. "Specification Testing In Models With Many Instruments," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(2), pages 427-441, April.
    5. Marine Carrasco & Guy Tchuente, 2016. "Efficient Estimation with Many Weak Instruments Using Regularization Techniques," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(8-10), pages 1609-1637, December.
    6. Hasselt, Martijn van, 2010. "Many Instruments Asymptotic Approximations Under Nonnormal Error Distributions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(2), pages 633-645, April.
    7. Bekker, Paul A, 1994. "Alternative Approximations to the Distributions of Instrumental Variable Estimators," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 62(3), pages 657-681, May.
    8. Carrasco, Marine & Florens, Jean-Pierre, 2000. "Generalization Of Gmm To A Continuum Of Moment Conditions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(6), pages 797-834, December.
    9. A. Belloni & D. Chen & V. Chernozhukov & C. Hansen, 2012. "Sparse Models and Methods for Optimal Instruments With an Application to Eminent Domain," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 80(6), pages 2369-2429, November.
    10. Douglas Staiger & James H. Stock, 1997. "Instrumental Variables Regression with Weak Instruments," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 65(3), pages 557-586, May.
    11. Andrews, Donald W.K. & Stock, James H., 2007. "Testing with many weak instruments," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 138(1), pages 24-46, May.
    12. Hansen, Christian & Hausman, Jerry & Newey, Whitney, 2008. "Estimation With Many Instrumental Variables," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 26, pages 398-422.
    13. Bun, Maurice J.G. & Windmeijer, Frank, 2011. "A comparison of bias approximations for the two-stage least squares (2SLS) estimator," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 76-79, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carrasco, Marine & Tchuente, Guy, 2015. "Regularized LIML for many instruments," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 186(2), pages 427-442.
    2. Alastair R. Hall, 2015. "Econometricians Have Their Moments: GMM at 32," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 91(S1), pages 1-24, June.
    3. Guy Tchuente, 2019. "Weak Identification and Estimation of Social Interaction Models," Papers 1902.06143, arXiv.org.
    4. Lee, Yoonseok & Okui, Ryo, 2012. "Hahn–Hausman test as a specification test," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 167(1), pages 133-139.
    5. Michal Kolesár & Raj Chetty & John Friedman & Edward Glaeser & Guido W. Imbens, 2015. "Identification and Inference With Many Invalid Instruments," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 474-484, October.
    6. Bai Huang & Tae-Hwy Lee & Aman Ullah, 2017. "A combined estimator of regression models with measurement errors," Indian Economic Review, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 73-91, December.
    7. Mardi Dungey & Vitali Alexeev & Jing Tian & Alastair R. Hall, 2015. "Econometricians Have Their Moments: GMM at 32," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 91, pages 1-24, June.
    8. Dennis Lim & Wenjie Wang & Yichong Zhang, 2022. "A Conditional Linear Combination Test with Many Weak Instruments," Papers 2207.11137, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2023.
    9. Kolesár, Michal, 2018. "Minimum distance approach to inference with many instruments," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 204(1), pages 86-100.
    10. Guy Tchuente, 2016. "Estimation of social interaction models using regularization," Studies in Economics 1607, School of Economics, University of Kent.
    11. Marine Carrasco & Guy Tchuente, 2016. "Regularization Based Anderson Rubin Tests for Many Instruments," Studies in Economics 1608, School of Economics, University of Kent.
    12. Marine Carrasco & Guy Tchuente, 2016. "Efficient Estimation with Many Weak Instruments Using Regularization Techniques," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(8-10), pages 1609-1637, December.
    13. Crudu, Federico & Mellace, Giovanni & Sándor, Zsolt, 2021. "Inference In Instrumental Variable Models With Heteroskedasticity And Many Instruments," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 37(2), pages 281-310, April.
    14. Yoonseok Lee & Yu Zhou, 2015. "Averaged Instrumental Variables Estimators," Center for Policy Research Working Papers 180, Center for Policy Research, Maxwell School, Syracuse University.
    15. Eric Gautier & Christiern Rose, 2022. "Fast, Robust Inference for Linear Instrumental Variables Models using Self-Normalized Moments," Papers 2211.02249, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2022.
    16. Wang, Wenjie & Kaffo, Maximilien, 2016. "Bootstrap inference for instrumental variable models with many weak instruments," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 192(1), pages 231-268.
    17. Alena Skolkova, 2023. "Instrumental Variable Estimation with Many Instruments Using Elastic-Net IV," CERGE-EI Working Papers wp759, The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education - Economics Institute, Prague.
    18. Anna Mikusheva & Liyang Sun, 2023. "Weak Identification with Many Instruments," Papers 2308.09535, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2024.
    19. Dakyung Seong, 2022. "Binary response model with many weak instruments," Papers 2201.04811, arXiv.org, revised May 2023.
    20. Hansen, Christian & Kozbur, Damian, 2014. "Instrumental variables estimation with many weak instruments using regularized JIVE," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 182(2), pages 290-308.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2106.15003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.