IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2012.09820.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Explicit RKF-Compact Scheme for Pricing Regime Switching American Options with Varying Time Step

Author

Listed:
  • Chinonso Nwankwo
  • Weizhong Dai

Abstract

In this research work, an explicit Runge-Kutta-Fehlberg (RKF) time integration with a fourth-order compact finite difference scheme in space and a high order analytical approximation of the optimal exercise boundary is employed for solving the regime-switching pricing model. In detail, we recast the free boundary problem into a system of nonlinear partial differential equations with a multi-fixed domain. We then introduce a transformation based on the square root function with a Lipschitz character from which a high order analytical approximation is obtained to compute the derivative of the optimal exercise boundary in each regime. We further compute the boundary values, asset option, and the option Greeks for each regime using fourth-order spatial discretization and adaptive time integration. In particular, the coupled assets options and option Greeks are estimated using Hermite interpolation with Newton basis. Finally, a numerical experiment is carried out with two- and four-regimes examples and results are compared with the existing methods. The results obtained from the numerical experiment show that the present method provides better performance in terms of computational speed and more accurate solutions with a large step size.

Suggested Citation

  • Chinonso Nwankwo & Weizhong Dai, 2020. "Explicit RKF-Compact Scheme for Pricing Regime Switching American Options with Varying Time Step," Papers 2012.09820, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2022.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2012.09820
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2012.09820
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lee, Jung-Kyung, 2020. "A simple numerical method for pricing American power put options," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    2. Daniel Sevcovic, 2007. "An iterative algorithm for evaluating approximations to the optimal exercise boundary for a nonlinear Black-Scholes equation," Papers 0710.5301, arXiv.org.
    3. Seung Hyun Kim, 2014. "Two Simple Numerical Methods for the Free Boundary in One-Phase Stefan Problem," Journal of Applied Mathematics, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-10, June.
    4. A. Mayo, 2004. "High-order accurate implicit finite difference method for evaluating American options," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 212-237.
    5. Carl Chiarella & Christina Nikitopoulos-Sklibosios & Erik Schlogl & Hongang Yang, 2016. "Pricing American Options under Regime Switching Using Method of Lines," Research Paper Series 368, Quantitative Finance Research Centre, University of Technology, Sydney.
    6. K. Zhang & K. Teo & M. Swartz, 2014. "A Robust Numerical Scheme For Pricing American Options Under Regime Switching Based On Penalty Method," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 43(4), pages 463-483, April.
    7. A. Q. M. Khaliq & R. H. Liu, 2009. "New Numerical Scheme For Pricing American Option With Regime-Switching," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 12(03), pages 319-340.
    8. Beom Jin Kim & Yong-Ki Ma & Hi Jun Choe, 2013. "A Simple Numerical Method for Pricing an American Put Option," Journal of Applied Mathematics, Hindawi, vol. 2013, pages 1-7, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chinonso I. Nwankwo & Weizhong Dai & Ruihua Liu, 2023. "Compact Finite Difference Scheme with Hermite Interpolation for Pricing American Put Options Based on Regime Switching Model," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 62(3), pages 817-854, October.
    2. Lu, Xiaoping & Putri, Endah R.M., 2020. "A semi-analytic valuation of American options under a two-state regime-switching economy," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 538(C).
    3. Chinonso Nwankwo & Weizhong Dai, 2020. "Multigrid Iterative Algorithm based on Compact Finite Difference Schemes and Hermite interpolation for Solving Regime Switching American Options," Papers 2008.00925, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2021.
    4. Chinonso Nwankwo & Weizhong Dai & Ruihua Liu, 2019. "Compact Finite Difference Scheme with Hermite Interpolation for Pricing American Put Options Based on Regime Switching Model," Papers 1908.04900, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2020.
    5. Bouteska, Ahmed & Sharif, Taimur & Abedin, Mohammad Zoynul, 2023. "COVID-19 and stock returns: Evidence from the Markov switching dependence approach," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    6. Jiao Li, 2016. "Trading VIX Futures under Mean Reversion with Regime Switching," Papers 1605.07945, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2016.
    7. Jiao Li, 2016. "Trading VIX futures under mean reversion with regime switching," International Journal of Financial Engineering (IJFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 3(03), pages 1-20, September.
    8. Samuel Chege Maina, 2011. "Credit Risk Modelling in Markovian HJM Term Structure Class of Models with Stochastic Volatility," PhD Thesis, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney, number 1-2011.
    9. Shirzadi, Mohammad & Rostami, Mohammadreza & Dehghan, Mehdi & Li, Xiaolin, 2023. "American options pricing under regime-switching jump-diffusion models with meshfree finite point method," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    10. Junkee Jeon & Geonwoo Kim, 2022. "Analytic Valuation Formula for American Strangle Option in the Mean-Reversion Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(15), pages 1-19, July.
    11. Carl Chiarella & Christina Nikitopoulos-Sklibosios & Erik Schlogl & Hongang Yang, 2016. "Pricing American Options under Regime Switching Using Method of Lines," Research Paper Series 368, Quantitative Finance Research Centre, University of Technology, Sydney.
    12. Anindya Goswami & Kuldip Singh Patel, 2024. "Estimation of domain truncation error for a system of PDEs arising in option pricing," Papers 2401.15570, arXiv.org.
    13. Vicky Henderson & Kamil Klad'ivko & Michael Monoyios & Christoph Reisinger, 2017. "Executive stock option exercise with full and partial information on a drift change point," Papers 1709.10141, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2020.
    14. Qinjing Qiu & Reiichiro Kawai, 2023. "Iterative Weak Approximation and Hard Bounds for Switching Diffusion," Journal of Theoretical Probability, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 1003-1036, June.
    15. D. Belomestny & M. Kaledin & J. Schoenmakers, 2019. "Semi-tractability of optimal stopping problems via a weighted stochastic mesh algorithm," Papers 1906.09431, arXiv.org.
    16. Tomas Bokes & Daniel Sevcovic, 2009. "Early exercise boundary for American type of floating strike Asian option and its numerical approximation," Papers 0912.1321, arXiv.org.
    17. Samuel Chege Maina, 2011. "Credit Risk Modelling in Markovian HJM Term Structure Class of Models with Stochastic Volatility," PhD Thesis, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney, number 5, July-Dece.
    18. Xinyue Wei & Cuilian You & Yujie Zhang, 2023. "European Option Pricing Under Fuzzy CEV Model," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 196(2), pages 415-432, February.
    19. Blessing Taruvinga & Boda Kang & Christina Sklibosios Nikitopoulos, 2018. "Pricing American Options with Jumps in Asset and Volatility," Research Paper Series 394, Quantitative Finance Research Centre, University of Technology, Sydney.
    20. Lee, Jung-Kyung, 2020. "A simple numerical method for pricing American power put options," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2012.09820. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.