IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1710.10487.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Dual control Monte Carlo method for tight bounds of value function under Heston stochastic volatility model

Author

Listed:
  • Jingtang Ma
  • Wenyuan Li
  • Harry Zheng

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to study the fast computation of the lower and upper bounds on the value function for utility maximization under the Heston stochastic volatility model with general utility functions. It is well known there is a closed form solution of the HJB equation for power utility due to its homothetic property. It is not possible to get closed form solution for general utilities and there is little literature on the numerical scheme to solve the HJB equation for the Heston model. In this paper we propose an efficient dual control Monte Carlo method for computing tight lower and upper bounds of the value function. We identify a particular form of the dual control which leads to the closed form upper bound for a class of utility functions, including power, non-HARA and Yarri utilities. Finally, we perform some numerical tests to see the efficiency, accuracy, and robustness of the method. The numerical results support strongly our proposed scheme.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingtang Ma & Wenyuan Li & Harry Zheng, 2017. "Dual control Monte Carlo method for tight bounds of value function under Heston stochastic volatility model," Papers 1710.10487, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1710.10487
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.10487
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ma, Jingtang & Li, Wenyuan & Zheng, Harry, 2017. "Dual control Monte-Carlo method for tight bounds of value function in regime switching utility maximization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(3), pages 851-862.
    2. Fang, Fang & Oosterlee, Kees, 2008. "A Novel Pricing Method For European Options Based On Fourier-Cosine Series Expansions," MPRA Paper 9319, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Richter, Anja, 2014. "Explicit solutions to quadratic BSDEs and applications to utility maximization in multivariate affine stochastic volatility models," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 124(11), pages 3578-3611.
    4. Thaleia Zariphopoulou, 2001. "A solution approach to valuation with unhedgeable risks," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 61-82.
    5. Roger Lord & Remmert Koekkoek & Dick Van Dijk, 2010. "A comparison of biased simulation schemes for stochastic volatility models," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 177-194.
    6. Heston, Steven L, 1993. "A Closed-Form Solution for Options with Stochastic Volatility with Applications to Bond and Currency Options," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 6(2), pages 327-343.
    7. Jan Kallsen & Johannes Muhle-Karbe, 2010. "Utility Maximization In Affine Stochastic Volatility Models," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(03), pages 459-477.
    8. Bian, Baojun & Zheng, Harry, 2015. "Turnpike property and convergence rate for an investment model with general utility functions," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 28-49.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. João Pedro Vidal Nunes & Tiago Ramalho Viegas Alcaria, 2016. "Valuation of forward start options under affine jump-diffusion models," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(5), pages 727-747, May.
    2. Nicole Bauerle & Sascha Desmettre, 2018. "Portfolio Optimization in Fractional and Rough Heston Models," Papers 1809.10716, arXiv.org, revised May 2019.
    3. Carl Chiarella & Susanne Griebsch & Boda Kang, 2013. "Investigating Time-Efficient Methods to Price Compound Options in the Heston Model," Research Paper Series 328, Quantitative Finance Research Centre, University of Technology, Sydney.
    4. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5524 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Yang Shen, 2020. "Effect of Variance Swap in Hedging Volatility Risk," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-34, July.
    6. M. Escobar-Anel & M. Kschonnek & R. Zagst, 2023. "Mind the cap!—constrained portfolio optimisation in Heston's stochastic volatility model," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(12), pages 1793-1813, November.
    7. Calvet, Laurent E. & Fearnley, Marcus & Fisher, Adlai J. & Leippold, Markus, 2015. "What is beneath the surface? Option pricing with multifrequency latent states," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 187(2), pages 498-511.
    8. Ferreiro-Ferreiro, Ana María & García-Rodríguez, José A. & Souto, Luis & Vázquez, Carlos, 2020. "A new calibration of the Heston Stochastic Local Volatility Model and its parallel implementation on GPUs," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 467-486.
    9. Sascha Desmettre & Sebastian Merkel & Annalena Mickel & Alexander Steinicke, 2023. "Worst-Case Optimal Investment in Incomplete Markets," Papers 2311.10021, arXiv.org.
    10. Cui, Zhenyu & Lars Kirkby, J. & Nguyen, Duy, 2017. "A general framework for discretely sampled realized variance derivatives in stochastic volatility models with jumps," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(1), pages 381-400.
    11. Marcos Escobar-Anel & Weili Fan, 2023. "The SEV-SV Model—Applications in Portfolio Optimization," Risks, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-34, January.
    12. Damir Filipovi'c & Martin Larsson, 2017. "Polynomial Jump-Diffusion Models," Papers 1711.08043, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2019.
    13. Song-Ping Zhu & Xin-Jiang He, 2018. "A hybrid computational approach for option pricing," International Journal of Financial Engineering (IJFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 5(03), pages 1-16, September.
    14. H. Peter Boswijk & Roger J. A. Laeven & Evgenii Vladimirov, 2022. "Estimating Option Pricing Models Using a Characteristic Function-Based Linear State Space Representation," Papers 2210.06217, arXiv.org.
    15. Branger, Nicole & Muck, Matthias & Seifried, Frank Thomas & Weisheit, Stefan, 2017. "Optimal portfolios when variances and covariances can jump," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 59-89.
    16. Mesias Alfeus, 2019. "Stochastic Modelling of New Phenomena in Financial Markets," PhD Thesis, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney, number 1-2019.
    17. Gudmundsson, Hilmar & Vyncke, David, 2019. "On the calibration of the 3/2 model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(3), pages 1178-1192.
    18. Marius Ascheberg & Nicole Branger & Holger Kraft & Frank Thomas Seifried, 2016. "When do jumps matter for portfolio optimization?," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(8), pages 1297-1311, August.
    19. Susanne Griebsch & Uwe Wystup, 2011. "On the valuation of fader and discrete barrier options in Heston's stochastic volatility model," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(5), pages 693-709.
    20. Eduardo Abi Jaber, 2018. "Lifting the Heston model," Papers 1810.04868, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2019.
    21. Martijn Pistorius & Johannes Stolte, 2012. "Fast computation of vanilla prices in time-changed models and implied volatilities using rational approximations," Papers 1203.6899, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1710.10487. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.