IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1701.08861.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

On a class of path-dependent singular stochastic control problems

Author

Listed:
  • Romuald Elie
  • Ludovic Moreau
  • Dylan Possamai

Abstract

This paper studies a class of non$-$Markovian singular stochastic control problems, for which we provide a novel probabilistic representation. The solution of such control problem is proved to identify with the solution of a $Z-$constrained BSDE, with dynamics associated to a non singular underlying forward process. Due to the non$-$Markovian environment, our main argumentation relies on the use of comparison arguments for path dependent PDEs. Our representation allows in particular to quantify the regularity of the solution to the singular stochastic control problem in terms of the space and time initial data. Our framework also extends to the consideration of degenerate diffusions, leading to the representation of the solution as the infimum of solutions to $Z-$constrained BSDEs. As an application, we study the utility maximisation problem with transaction costs for non$-$Markovian dynamics.

Suggested Citation

  • Romuald Elie & Ludovic Moreau & Dylan Possamai, 2017. "On a class of path-dependent singular stochastic control problems," Papers 1701.08861, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2018.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1701.08861
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1701.08861
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boetius, Frederik & Kohlmann, Michael, 1998. "Connections between optimal stopping and singular stochastic control," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 77(2), pages 253-281, September.
    2. Bruno Bouchard & Marcel Nutz, 2011. "Weak Dynamic Programming for Generalized State Constraints," Papers 1105.0745, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2012.
    3. M. H. A. Davis & A. R. Norman, 1990. "Portfolio Selection with Transaction Costs," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 676-713, November.
    4. Jan Kallsen & Shen Li, 2013. "Portfolio Optimization under Small Transaction Costs: a Convex Duality Approach," Papers 1309.3479, arXiv.org.
    5. Bruno Bouchard & Marcel Nutz, 2015. "Stochastic Target Games and Dynamic Programming via Regularized Viscosity Solutions," Post-Print hal-00846830, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bruno Bouchard & Ludovic Moreau & Mete H. Soner, 2016. "Hedging under an expected loss constraint with small transaction costs," Post-Print hal-00863562, HAL.
    2. Bruno Bouchard & Johannes Muhle-Karbe, 2018. "Simple Bounds for Transaction Costs," Working Papers hal-01711371, HAL.
    3. Johannes Muhle-Karbe & Max Reppen & H. Mete Soner, 2016. "A Primer on Portfolio Choice with Small Transaction Costs," Papers 1612.01302, arXiv.org, revised May 2017.
    4. Ren Liu & Johannes Muhle-Karbe & Marko H. Weber, 2014. "Rebalancing with Linear and Quadratic Costs," Papers 1402.5306, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2017.
    5. Martin Herdegen & Johannes Muhle-Karbe, 2018. "Stability of Radner equilibria with respect to small frictions," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 443-502, April.
    6. Dianetti, Jodi & Ferrari, Giorgio, 2019. "Nonzero-Sum Submodular Monotone-Follower Games. Existence and Approximation of Nash Equilibria," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 605, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    7. Christoph Belak & Jörn Sass, 2019. "Finite-horizon optimal investment with transaction costs: construction of the optimal strategies," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 861-888, October.
    8. Bruno Bouchard & Ludovic Moreau & Mete H. Soner, 2013. "Hedging under an expected loss constraint with small transaction costs," Papers 1309.4916, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2014.
    9. Bruno Bouchard & Johannes Muhle-Karbe, 2022. "Simple Bounds for Transaction Costs," Post-Print hal-01711371, HAL.
    10. Ludovic Moreau & Johannes Muhle-Karbe & H. Mete Soner, 2014. "Trading with Small Price Impact," Papers 1402.5304, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2015.
    11. Ibrahim Ekren & Ren Liu & Johannes Muhle-Karbe, 2015. "Optimal Rebalancing Frequencies for Multidimensional Portfolios," Papers 1510.05097, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2017.
    12. Bruno Bouchard & Johannes Muhle-Karbe, 2018. "Simple Bounds for Utility Maximization with Small Transaction Costs," Papers 1802.06120, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2021.
    13. Bouchard, Bruno & Muhle-Karbe, Johannes, 2022. "Simple bounds for utility maximization with small transaction costs," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 98-113.
    14. Colin Atkinson & Emmeline Storey, 2010. "Building an Optimal Portfolio in Discrete Time in the Presence of Transaction Costs," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 323-357.
    15. Kohlmann, Michael, 1999. "(Reflected) Backward Stochastic Differential Equations and Contingent Claims," CoFE Discussion Papers 99/10, University of Konstanz, Center of Finance and Econometrics (CoFE).
    16. Dokuchaev, Nikolai, 2010. "Optimality of myopic strategies for multi-stock discrete time market with management costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(2), pages 551-556, January.
    17. Cuoco, Domenico & Liu, Hong, 2000. "Optimal consumption of a divisible durable good," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 561-613, April.
    18. Bjork, Tomas, 2009. "Arbitrage Theory in Continuous Time," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 3, number 9780199574742.
    19. Jan Kallsen & Johannes Muhle-Karbe, 2013. "The General Structure of Optimal Investment and Consumption with Small Transaction Costs," Papers 1303.3148, arXiv.org, revised May 2015.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1701.08861. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.