IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1612.07132.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Conditional loss probabilities for systems of economic agents sharing light-tailed claims with analysis of portfolio diversification benefits

Author

Listed:
  • Claudia Kluppelberg
  • Miriam Isabel Seifert

Abstract

We analyze systems of agents sharing light-tailed risky claims issued by different financial objects. Assuming exponentially distributed claims, we obtain that both agents' and system's losses follow generalized exponential mixture distributions. We show that this leads to qualitatively different results on individual and system risks compared to heavy-tailed claims previously studied in the literature. By deducing conditional loss distributions we investigate the impact of stress situations on agents' and system's losses. Moreover, we present a criterion for agents to decide whether holding few objects or portfolio diversification minimizes their risks in system crisis situations.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudia Kluppelberg & Miriam Isabel Seifert, 2016. "Conditional loss probabilities for systems of economic agents sharing light-tailed claims with analysis of portfolio diversification benefits," Papers 1612.07132, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1612.07132
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1612.07132
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vathana Ly Vath & Mohamed Mnif & Huyên Pham, 2007. "A model of optimal portfolio selection under liquidity risk and price impact," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 51-90, January.
    2. Hernández, Camilo & Junca, Mauricio, 2015. "Optimal dividend payments under a time of ruin constraint: Exponential claims," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 136-142.
    3. Brechmann, Eike C. & Hendrich, Katharina & Czado, Claudia, 2013. "Conditional copula simulation for systemic risk stress testing," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 722-732.
    4. Georg Mainik & Ludger Rüschendorf, 2010. "On optimal portfolio diversification with respect to extreme risks," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 593-623, December.
    5. Camilo Hernandez & Mauricio Junca, 2014. "Optimal dividend payment under time of ruin contraint: Exponential case," Papers 1410.3793, arXiv.org, revised May 2015.
    6. Jiang, Jun & Tang, Qihe, 2008. "Reinsurance under the LCR and ECOMOR treaties with emphasis on light-tailed claims," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 431-436, December.
    7. Rustam Ibragimov, 2009. "Portfolio diversification and value at risk under thick-tailedness," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(5), pages 565-580.
    8. Jianming Xia, 2004. "Multi-agent investment in incomplete markets," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 241-259, May.
    9. Oliver Kley & Claudia Klüppelberg & Gesine Reinert, 2016. "Risk in a Large Claims Insurance Market with Bipartite Graph Structure," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(5), pages 1159-1176, October.
    10. Paul Embrechts & Bin Wang & Ruodu Wang, 2015. "Aggregation-robustness and model uncertainty of regulatory risk measures," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 763-790, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Claudia Klüppelberg & Miriam Isabel Seifert, 2019. "Financial risk measures for a network of individual agents holding portfolios of light-tailed objects," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 795-826, October.
    2. Steven Kou & Xianhua Peng, 2016. "On the Measurement of Economic Tail Risk," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(5), pages 1056-1072, October.
    3. Oliver Kley & Claudia Kluppelberg & Gesine Reinert, 2014. "Risk in a large claims insurance market with bipartite graph structure," Papers 1410.8671, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2015.
    4. Kley, Oliver & Klüppelberg, Claudia & Paterlini, Sandra, 2020. "Modelling extremal dependence for operational risk by a bipartite graph," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    5. Xia Han & Liyuan Lin & Ruodu Wang, 2022. "Diversification quotients: Quantifying diversification via risk measures," Papers 2206.13679, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.
    6. Xia Han & Liyuan Lin & Ruodu Wang, 2023. "Diversification quotients based on VaR and ES," Papers 2301.03517, arXiv.org, revised May 2023.
    7. Oliver Kley & Claudia Klüppelberg & Gesine Reinert, 2016. "Risk in a Large Claims Insurance Market with Bipartite Graph Structure," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(5), pages 1159-1176, October.
    8. Tong, Bin & Wu, Chongfeng & Xu, Weidong, 2012. "Risk concentration of aggregated dependent risks: The second-order properties," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 139-149.
    9. Farkas, Walter & Fringuellotti, Fulvia & Tunaru, Radu, 2020. "A cost-benefit analysis of capital requirements adjusted for model risk," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    10. Camilo Hernandez & Mauricio Junca & Harold Moreno-Franco, 2016. "A time of ruin constrained optimal dividend problem for spectrally one-sided L\'evy processes," Papers 1608.02550, arXiv.org, revised May 2017.
    11. Chang, Carolyn W. & Li, Xiaodan & Lin, Edward M.H. & Yu, Min-Teh, 2018. "Systemic risk, interconnectedness, and non-core activities in Taiwan insurance industry," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 273-284.
    12. John H. J. Einmahl & Fan Yang & Chen Zhou, 2021. "Testing the Multivariate Regular Variation Model," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(4), pages 907-919, October.
    13. Carole Bernard & Ludger Rüschendorf & Steven Vanduffel & Ruodu Wang, 2017. "Risk bounds for factor models," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 631-659, July.
    14. Villena, Marcelo J. & Reus, Lorenzo, 2016. "On the strategic behavior of large investors: A mean-variance portfolio approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 679-688.
    15. Nicole Branger & An Chen & Antje Mahayni & Thai Nguyen, 2023. "Optimal collective investment: an analysis of individual welfare," Mathematics and Financial Economics, Springer, volume 17, number 5, June.
    16. Baccarin, Stefano, 2009. "Optimal impulse control for a multidimensional cash management system with generalized cost functions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(1), pages 198-206, July.
    17. Stefano Baccarin, 2013. "Optimal Consumption of a Generalized Geometric Brownian Motion with Fixed and Variable Intervention Costs," Working papers 021, Department of Economics and Statistics (Dipartimento di Scienze Economico-Sociali e Matematico-Statistiche), University of Torino.
    18. Robert Jarrow, 2018. "Asset market equilibrium with liquidity risk," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 253-288, May.
    19. Mainik, Georg & Mitov, Georgi & Rüschendorf, Ludger, 2015. "Portfolio optimization for heavy-tailed assets: Extreme Risk Index vs. Markowitz," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 115-134.
    20. Henryk Zähle, 2022. "A concept of copula robustness and its applications in quantitative risk management," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 825-875, October.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1612.07132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.