IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1608.01197.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Efficient exposure computation by risk factor decomposition

Author

Listed:
  • Cornelis S. L. de Graaf
  • Drona Kandhai
  • Christoph Reisinger

Abstract

The focus of this paper is the efficient computation of counterparty credit risk exposure on portfolio level. Here, the large number of risk factors rules out traditional PDE-based techniques and allows only a relatively small number of paths for nested Monte Carlo simulations, resulting in large variances of estimators in practice. We propose a novel approach based on Kolmogorov forward and backward PDEs, where we counter the high dimensionality by a generalisation of anchored-ANOVA decompositions. By computing only the most significant terms in the decomposition, the dimensionality is reduced effectively, such that a significant computational speed-up arises from the high accuracy of PDE schemes in low dimensions compared to Monte Carlo estimation. Moreover, we show how this truncated decomposition can be used as control variate for the full high-dimensional model, such that any approximation errors can be corrected while a substantial variance reduction is achieved compared to the standard simulation approach. We investigate the accuracy for a realistic portfolio of exchange options, interest rate and cross-currency swaps under a fully calibrated ten-factor model.

Suggested Citation

  • Cornelis S. L. de Graaf & Drona Kandhai & Christoph Reisinger, 2016. "Efficient exposure computation by risk factor decomposition," Papers 1608.01197, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2018.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1608.01197
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1608.01197
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Doust, 2012. "The Stochastic Intrinsic Currency Volatility Model: A Consistent Framework for Multiple FX Rates and Their Volatilities," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(5), pages 381-445, November.
    2. Cornelis S. L. De Graaf & Qian Feng & Drona Kandhai & Cornelis W. Oosterlee, 2014. "Efficient Computation Of Exposure Profiles For Counterparty Credit Risk," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(04), pages 1-23.
    3. Mark Broadie & Yiping Du & Ciamac C. Moallemi, 2011. "Efficient Risk Estimation via Nested Sequential Simulation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(6), pages 1172-1194, June.
    4. Tinne Haentjens & Karel J. in 't Hout, 2015. "ADI Schemes for Pricing American Options under the Heston Model," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 207-237, July.
    5. Alexander, S. & Coleman, T.F. & Li, Y., 2006. "Minimizing CVaR and VaR for a portfolio of derivatives," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 583-605, February.
    6. Mark Joshi & Oh Kang Kwon, 2016. "Least Squares Monte Carlo Credit Value Adjustment With Small And Unidirectional Bias," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(08), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Andrey Itkin, 2015. "HIGH ORDER SPLITTING METHODS FOR FORWARD PDEs AND PIDEs," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(05), pages 1-24.
    8. Longstaff, Francis A & Schwartz, Eduardo S, 2001. "Valuing American Options by Simulation: A Simple Least-Squares Approach," University of California at Los Angeles, Anderson Graduate School of Management qt43n1k4jb, Anderson Graduate School of Management, UCLA.
    9. Longstaff, Francis A & Schwartz, Eduardo S, 2001. "Valuing American Options by Simulation: A Simple Least-Squares Approach," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 14(1), pages 113-147.
    10. Mark Broadie & Yiping Du & Ciamac C. Moallemi, 2015. "Risk Estimation via Regression," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(5), pages 1077-1097, October.
    11. Michael B. Gordy & Sandeep Juneja, 2010. "Nested Simulation in Portfolio Risk Measurement," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(10), pages 1833-1848, October.
    12. Luca Capriotti & Yupeng Jiang & Andrea Macrina, 2015. "Real-time risk management: An AAD-PDE approach," International Journal of Financial Engineering (IJFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 2(04), pages 1-31, December.
    13. Andrew Green & Chris Kenyon, 2014. "KVA: Capital Valuation Adjustment," Papers 1405.0515, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2014.
    14. De Col, Alvise & Gnoatto, Alessandro & Grasselli, Martino, 2013. "Smiles all around: FX joint calibration in a multi-Heston model," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 3799-3818.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Salvador, Beatriz & Oosterlee, Cornelis W., 2021. "Corrigendum to ``Total value adjustment for a stochastic volatility model. A comparison with the Black–Scholes model''," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 406(C).
    2. Alessandro Gnoatto & Athena Picarelli & Christoph Reisinger, 2020. "Deep xVA solver -- A neural network based counterparty credit risk management framework," Papers 2005.02633, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2022.
    3. Kumar, Manish & Kumar, Arun, 2017. "Performance assessment and degradation analysis of solar photovoltaic technologies: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 554-587.
    4. Salvador, Beatriz & Oosterlee, Cornelis W., 2021. "Total value adjustment for a stochastic volatility model. A comparison with the Black–Scholes model," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 391(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alessandro Gnoatto & Athena Picarelli & Christoph Reisinger, 2020. "Deep xVA solver -- A neural network based counterparty credit risk management framework," Papers 2005.02633, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2022.
    2. Mingbin Ben Feng & Eunhye Song, 2020. "Optimal Nested Simulation Experiment Design via Likelihood Ratio Method," Papers 2008.13087, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2021.
    3. Andersson, Kristoffer & Oosterlee, Cornelis W., 2021. "A deep learning approach for computations of exposure profiles for high-dimensional Bermudan options," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 408(C).
    4. Kun Zhang & Ben Mingbin Feng & Guangwu Liu & Shiyu Wang, 2022. "Sample Recycling for Nested Simulation with Application in Portfolio Risk Measurement," Papers 2203.15929, arXiv.org.
    5. Patrick Cheridito & John Ery & Mario V. Wüthrich, 2020. "Assessing Asset-Liability Risk with Neural Networks," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-17, February.
    6. Patrick Cheridito & John Ery & Mario V. Wuthrich, 2021. "Assessing asset-liability risk with neural networks," Papers 2105.12432, arXiv.org.
    7. L. Jeff Hong & Sandeep Juneja & Guangwu Liu, 2017. "Kernel Smoothing for Nested Estimation with Application to Portfolio Risk Measurement," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(3), pages 657-673, June.
    8. Guangxin Jiang & L. Jeff Hong & Barry L. Nelson, 2020. "Online Risk Monitoring Using Offline Simulation," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 356-375, April.
    9. Feng, Ben Mingbin & Li, Johnny Siu-Hang & Zhou, Kenneth Q., 2022. "Green nested simulation via likelihood ratio: Applications to longevity risk management," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 285-301.
    10. Fabian Dickmann & Nikolaus Schweizer, 2014. "Faster Comparison of Stopping Times by Nested Conditional Monte Carlo," Papers 1402.0243, arXiv.org.
    11. Lokman A. Abbas-Turki & Stéphane Crépey & Babacar Diallo, 2018. "Xva Principles, Nested Monte Carlo Strategies, And Gpu Optimizations," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(06), pages 1-40, September.
    12. Mark Broadie & Yiping Du & Ciamac C. Moallemi, 2015. "Risk Estimation via Regression," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(5), pages 1077-1097, October.
    13. Lotfi Boudabsa & Damir Filipovi'c, 2022. "Ensemble learning for portfolio valuation and risk management," Papers 2204.05926, arXiv.org.
    14. Ankirchner, Stefan & Schneider, Judith C. & Schweizer, Nikolaus, 2014. "Cross-hedging minimum return guarantees: Basis and liquidity risks," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 93-109.
    15. Junyao Chen & Tony Sit & Hoi Ying Wong, 2019. "Simulation-based Value-at-Risk for Nonlinear Portfolios," Papers 1904.09088, arXiv.org.
    16. Lucio Fernandez‐Arjona & Damir Filipović, 2022. "A machine learning approach to portfolio pricing and risk management for high‐dimensional problems," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 982-1019, October.
    17. Hongjun Ha & Daniel Bauer, 2022. "A least-squares Monte Carlo approach to the estimation of enterprise risk," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 417-459, July.
    18. Fort Gersende & Gobet Emmanuel & Moulines Eric, 2017. "MCMC design-based non-parametric regression for rare event. Application to nested risk computations," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 23(1), pages 21-42, March.
    19. Purba Banerjee & Vasudeva Murthy & Shashi Jain, 2024. "Method of Lines for Valuation and Sensitivities of Bermudan Options," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 63(1), pages 245-270, January.
    20. T. van der Zwaard & L. A. Grzelak & C. W. Oosterlee, 2024. "On the Hull-White model with volatility smile for Valuation Adjustments," Papers 2403.14841, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1608.01197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.