The Fundamental Theorem of Utility Maximization and Num\'eraire Portfolio
AbstractThe fundamental theorem of utility maximization (called FTUM hereafter) says that the utility maximization admits solution if and only if there exists an equivalent martingale measure. This theorem is true for discrete market models (where the number of scenarios is finite), and remains valid for general discrete-time market models when the utility is smooth enough. However, this theorem --in this current formulation-- fails in continuous-time framework even with nice utility function, where there might exist arbitrage opportunities and optimal portfolio. This paper addresses the question how far we can weaken the non-arbitrage condition as well as the utility maximization problem to preserve their complete and strong relationship described by the FTUM. As application of our version of the FTUM, we establish equivalence between the No-Unbounded-Profit-with-Bounded-Risk condition, the existence of num\'eraire portfolio, and the existence of solution to the utility maximization under equivalent probability measure. The latter fact can be interpreted as a sort of weak form of market's viability, while this equivalence is established with a much less technical approach. Furthermore, the obtained equivalent probability can be chosen as close to the real-world probability measure as we want (but might not be equal).
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by arXiv.org in its series Papers with number 1211.4598.
Date of creation: Nov 2012
Date of revision: Nov 2012
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://arxiv.org/
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Marco Frittelli, 2000. "The Minimal Entropy Martingale Measure and the Valuation Problem in Incomplete Markets," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(1), pages 39-52.
- Kallal, Hedi & Jouini, Elyès, 1995. "Martingales and arbitrage in securities markets with transaction costs," Economics Papers from University Paris Dauphine 123456789/5630, Paris Dauphine University.
- Ralf Korn & Frank Oertel & Manfred Schäl, 2003. "Notes and Comments: The numeraire portfolio in financial markets modeled by a multi-dimensional jump diffusion process," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 153-166, November.
- Kramkov, D.O., 1994. "Optional decomposition of supermartingales and hedging contingent claims in incomplete security markets," Discussion Paper Serie B 294, University of Bonn, Germany.
- Dirk Becherer, 2001. "The numeraire portfolio for unbounded semimartingales," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 327-341.
- repec:fth:inseep:9513 is not listed on IDEAS
- Hardy Hulley & Martin Schweizer, 2010. "M6 - On Minimal Market Models and Minimal Martingale Measures," Research Paper Series 280, Quantitative Finance Research Centre, University of Technology, Sydney.
- Yuri M. Kabanov & Christophe Stricker, 2002. "On the optimal portfolio for the exponential utility maximization: remarks to the six-author paper," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(2), pages 125-134.
- Jouini Elyes & Kallal Hedi, 1995. "Martingales and Arbitrage in Securities Markets with Transaction Costs," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 178-197, June.
- Claudio Fontana, 2013. "Weak and strong no-arbitrage conditions for continuous financial markets," Papers 1302.7192, arXiv.org.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (arXiv administrators).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.