IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/urdbrr/280104.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Selecting a Cooperative Membership Structure for the Agriculture-of-the- Middle Initiative

Author

Listed:
  • Gray, Thomas W.

Abstract

This study explores choices of cooperative structure — local, centralized, or federated — for mid-size farms, also referred to as the “agriculture-of-the-middle” (AOTM) or farms of “the disappearing middle.” They are referred to as “in the middle” structurally (in terms of numbers and production output) because they are positioned between large industrialized farms and much smaller farms located near metropolitan areas. The largest farms have increased in numbers as well in the proportion of total U.S. farms..These farms fit the large-scale, industrialized and commodity-production farm model. The smallest farms have increased in numbers and output as well and are generally specialized for “local” and organic markets. The financial stability of many farms in the middle is tenuous. They generally have both too much output and are too distant from metropolitan areas to take advantage of the niche markets that the smallest farms have been able to access. While further industrialization and increasing scale may be an option for some, for most it is not desired and/or possible financially. “Middle farms” are a focus for different interest groups-including farmers, food wholesalers and retailers, university and government personnel, non-government organizations (NGOs), independent certification organizations and rural and community development experts- -seeking to protect and expand farm viability. Their strategies are generally organized to develop niche-specified, differentiated products that encompass various sustainability agendas (economic, social, and environmental sustainability). These initiatives are, in fact, budding collective actions that seek to mobilize AOTM farmers for survival. This report argues that the historical conditions setting the context for this mobilization cannot be taken lightly. The report, therefore, reviews the historically based changes that have occurred in the agricultural context--i.e., shifts in agricultural production, changes in agribusiness complexity, and changes in consumption patterns--and understands these changes as the historically set conditions that the AOTM initiatives must accommodate in their development strategies. From this socio-historical context, the paper assesses different cooperative membership structures--local, centralized, and federated-- for their appropriateness to the collective action initiatives of the mid-level farms.

Suggested Citation

  • Gray, Thomas W., 2009. "Selecting a Cooperative Membership Structure for the Agriculture-of-the- Middle Initiative," Research Reports 280104, United States Department of Agriculture, Rural Development.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:urdbrr:280104
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.280104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/280104/files/rr216.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.280104?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bruce W. Marion & Donghwan Kim, 1991. "Concentration change in selected food manufacturing industries: The influence of mergers vs. internal growth," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 7(5), pages 415-431.
    2. Seipel, Michael F. & Heffeman, William D., 1997. "Cooperatives in a Changing Global Food System," Research Reports 280003, United States Department of Agriculture, Rural Development.
    3. Ronald W. Cotterill, 1999. "High cereal prices and the prospects for relief by expansion of private label and antitrust enforcement," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(2), pages 229-245.
    4. Dunn, John R., 1988. "Basic Cooperative Principles and Their Relationship to Selected Practices," Journal of Agricultural Cooperation, National Council of Farmer Cooperatives, vol. 3, pages 1-11.
    5. Mooney, Patrick & Gray, Thomas W., 2002. "Cooperative Conversion and Restructuring in Theory and Practice," Research Reports 280024, United States Department of Agriculture, Rural Development.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Áine Macken Walsh, 2010. "Agriculture, Rural Development and Potential for a ‘Middle Agriculture' in Ireland," Working Papers 1004, Rural Economy and Development Programme,Teagasc.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dionisio Ortiz-Miranda & Olga M Moreno-Pérez & Ana M Moragues-Faus, 2010. "Innovative Strategies of Agricultural Cooperatives in the Framework of the New Rural Development Paradigms: The Case of the Region of Valencia (Spain)," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(3), pages 661-677, March.
    2. Stofferahn, Curtis W., 2010. "South Dakota Soybean Processors: The Discourse of Conversion from Cooperative to Limited Liability Corporation," Journal of Cooperatives, NCERA-210, vol. 24, pages 1-33.
    3. Evans, Lewis & Meade, Richard, 2005. "The Role and Significance of Cooperatives in New Zealand Agriculture, A Comparative Institutional Analysis," Working Paper Series 3847, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
    4. Idris, Nurjihan & Arshad, Fatimah Mohamed & Radam, Alias & Ali, Noor Azman, 2009. "Construct validation of supply chain management in cooperative," MPRA Paper 19483, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Günter J. Hitsch, 2006. "An Empirical Model of Optimal Dynamic Product Launch and Exit Under Demand Uncertainty," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 25-50, 01-02.
    6. Reynolds, Bruce J., 2000. "Cooperative Principles as Constraints for Public Goods Production," 2000 Annual Meeting, December 12-13 31808, NCERA-194 Research on Cooperatives.
    7. Nevo, Aviv, 2001. "Measuring Market Power in the Ready-to-Eat Cereal Industry," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 69(2), pages 307-342, March.
    8. Richards, Timothy J. & Patterson, Paul M., 2002. "Strategic Interaction With Multiple Tools: A New Empirical Model," Working Papers 28545, Arizona State University, Morrison School of Agribusiness and Resource Management.
    9. Cook, Michael L. & Burress, Molly J. & Iliopoulos, Constantine, 2008. "New Producer Strategies: The Emergence of Patron-Driven Entrepreneurship," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 44397, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Kojo S. Amanor, 2019. "Global Value Chains and Agribusiness in Africa: Upgrading or Capturing Smallholder Production?," Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, Centre for Agrarian Research and Education for South, vol. 8(1-2), pages 30-63, April.
    11. Nilsson, Jerker & Helgesson, Matilda & Rommel, Jens & Svensson, Ellinor, 2020. "Forest-owner support for their cooperative's provision of public goods," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    12. Evans, Lewis & Meade, Richard, 2005. "The Role and Significance of Cooperatives in New Zealand Agriculture, A Comparative Institutional Analysis," Working Paper Series 18942, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
    13. Hao, Jinghui & Heerink, Nico & Heijman, Wim & Bijman, Jos, 2017. "Cooperatives Membership And Smallholder Farmers’ Welfare - Evidence From Shaanxi And Shandong Provinces, China," 2017 International Congress, August 28-September 1, 2017, Parma, Italy 260914, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Hao, J., 2018. "Cooperative member commitment, trust and social pressure -- the role of members’ participation in the decision-making," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 275881, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Avi Goldfarb & Qiang Lu & Sridhar Moorthy, 2009. "Measuring Brand Value in an Equilibrium Framework," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 69-86, 01-02.
    16. Cotterill, Ronald W & Putsis, William P, Jr & Dhar, Ravi, 2000. "Assessing the Competitive Interaction between Private Labels and National Brands," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 73(1), pages 109-137, January.
    17. Isaac Zúñiga Aguilar, 2022. "Neuroeconomics in Cooperatives: Hierarchy of Emotional Patterns in the Collective Decision-Making Process for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-31, June.
    18. Ding, John Y. & Caswell, Julie A. & Zhou, Furen, 1997. "Relatedness And Performance: A Reexamination Of The Diversification-Performance Link," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 28(1), pages 1-8, February.
    19. George Hendrikse, 2011. "Pooling, Access, and Countervailing Power in Channel Governance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(9), pages 1692-1702, March.
    20. Ollila, Petri & Nilsson, Jerker & Hess, Sebastian, 2014. "Farmers’ reactions to the internationalisation of Finnish cooperatives," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182936, European Association of Agricultural Economists.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural Finance; Farm Management;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:urdbrr:280104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rdagvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.