IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uersib/33893.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Whole-Farm Approaches to a Safety Net

Author

Listed:
  • Dismukes, Robert
  • Durst, Ron L.

Abstract

In recent farm policy debates, proposals for a whole-farm revenue safety net program have been put forward that could provide a farm-income safety net for a wide variety of farming activities. These proposals include income- stabilization accounts and whole-farm revenue insurance. Risk protection from income-stabilization accounts would depend on the reserves in individual accounts and the structure of program benefits. Experience with farm savings accounts in Canada and Australia suggests that lack of adequate account balances and buildup of balances beyond the level required for risk management can reduce program effectiveness. Whole-farm revenue insurance could overcome these problems since coverage would not depend on the farmer's ability to build an account balance and benefits would only be realized when the farmer suffers a drop in income. However, the complexity of factors affecting income variability raises questions about the feasibility of a whole-farm insurance plan.

Suggested Citation

  • Dismukes, Robert & Durst, Ron L., 2006. "Whole-Farm Approaches to a Safety Net," Economic Information Bulletin 33893, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uersib:33893
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.33893
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/33893/files/ei060015.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.33893?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chang, Hung-Hao & Schmit, Todd M. & Boisvert, Richard N. & Tauer, Loren W., 2007. "Quantifying Sources of Dairy Farm Business Risk and Implications for Risk Management Strategies," Working Papers 127012, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    2. Hisham S. El-Osta, 2018. "Strategies to Manage Risk and their Role in Impacting Economic Performance among Farm Households," Applied Economics and Finance, Redfame publishing, vol. 5(2), pages 49-64, March.
    3. Farrin, Katie & Miranda, Mario J. & O'Donoghue, Erik, 2016. "How Do Time and Money Affect Agricultural Insurance Uptake? A New Approach to Farm Risk Management Analysis," Economic Research Report 262194, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Turvey, Calum G., 2010. "Whole Farm Income Insurance in a Canadian Context," 2010 Annual Meeting, July 25-27, 2010, Denver, Colorado 61732, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    5. Williams, Jeffery R. & Saffert, Andrew T. & Barnaby, G. Art & Llewelyn, Richard V. & Langemeier, Michael R., 2014. "A Risk Analysis of Adjusted Gross Revenue-Lite on Beef Farms," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 46(2), pages 227-244, May.
    6. Meuwissen, Miranda P.M. & Van Asseldonk, Marcel A.P.M. & Pietola, Kyosti & Hardaker, J. Brian & Huirne, Ruud B.M., 2011. "Income insurance as a risk management tool after 2013 CAP reforms?," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114649, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. -, 2009. "The outlook for agriculture and rural development in the Americas: a perspective on Latin America and the Caribbean, 2009," Coediciones, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 1379 edited by Iica, July.
    8. Bahrs, Enno & Blanck, Niklas, 2009. "Die Risikoausgleichsrücklage als Instrument des landwirtschaftlichen Risikomanagements," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 58(04), pages 1-9, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersib:33893. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.