IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uerser/307953.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Corporate Farming: Importance, Incentives, and State Restrictions

Author

Listed:
  • Krause, Kenneth R.

Abstract

The number of incorporated farms in the United States rose by 140 percent from 1969-78. Tax advantages provided the chief impetus for farmers to incorporate: corporate tax rates declined in the seventies, while individual tax rates rose, mainly because of inflation. Despite the increase in farm corporations, most farms remain sole proprietorships and most incorporated farms are family farms. Nonfamily farms accounted for only 7 percent of farm sales in 1978. Eleven States had enacted legislation as of 1981 to restrict corporate farm activities (farm operations, vertical integration, and ownership of farmland).

Suggested Citation

  • Krause, Kenneth R., 1983. "Corporate Farming: Importance, Incentives, and State Restrictions," Agricultural Economic Reports 307953, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uerser:307953
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.307953
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/307953/files/aer506.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.307953?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Unknown, 1979. "Who Owns the Land: A Preliminary Report of a U.S. Landownership Survey," Economics Statistics and Cooperative Services (ESCS) Reports 143674, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Krause, Kenneth R. & Shapiro, Harvey, 1974. "Tax-Induced Investment In Agriculture: Gaps In Research," Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 26(1), pages 1-9, January.
    3. Dale C. Dahl, 1975. "Public Policy Changes Needed to Cope with Changing Structure," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 57(2), pages 206-213.
    4. Lin, William W. & Coffman, George & Penn, J. B., 1980. "U.S. Farm Numbers, Sizes, and Related Structural Dimensions: Projections to Year 2000," Technical Bulletins 157730, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    5. Stanton, B.F., 1978. "Perspective On Farm Size," 1978 Annual Meeting, August 6-9, Blacksburg, Virginia 284213, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    6. Lee, Linda K., 1978. "A Perspective on Cropland Availability," Agricultural Economic Reports 307684, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    7. Philip M. Raup, 1978. "Some Questions of Value and Scale in American Agriculture," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 60(2), pages 303-308.
    8. Emanuel Melichar, 1979. "Capital Gains versus Current Income in the Farming Sector," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 61(5), pages 1085-1092.
    9. Gulley, James L., 1974. "Beliefs and Values in American Farming," Miscellaneous Publications 327167, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    10. B. F. Stanton, 1978. "Perspective on Farm Size," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 60(5), pages 727-737.
    11. John E. Lee, 1980. "Public policy toward agricultural credit," Proceedings – Rural and Agricultural Conferences, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, pages 83-110.
    12. Lewis, James A., 1980. "Landownership in the United States, 1978," Agricultural Information Bulletins 309242, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    13. Mayer, Joseph W., 1981. "State Laws Relating to the Ownership of U.S. Land by Aliens and Business Entities," Staff Reports 324706, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wachenheim, Cheryl J. & Saxowsky, David, 2003. "Profits and Risk: Fitting an Old Framework to a New Agriculture," Journal of the ASFMRA, American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers, vol. 2003, pages 1-10.
    2. Matthey, Holger & Royer, Jeffrey S., 1999. "Testing The Impact Of Corporate Farming Laws On Hog Industry Growth: A Partial Adjustment Approach," 1999 Annual meeting, August 8-11, Nashville, TN 21697, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    3. Adhikari, Bishwa B. & Harsh, Stephen B. & Cheney, Laura Martin, 2003. "Factors Affecting Regional Shifts Of U.S Pork Production," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 22200, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    4. Park, Dooho & Seidl, Andrew & Davies, Stephen, 2002. "Environmental Policy and Industry Location: The Case of the U.S. Livestock Industry," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 32(2), pages 293-307, Summer/Fa.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zulauf, Carl R., 1986. "CHANGES IN SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS OF U.S. FARMS DURING THE 1970s AND EARLY 1980s: AN INVESTIGATION BASED ON CURRENT AND CONSTANT DOLLAR SALES CATEGORIES," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 18(1), pages 1-10, July.
    2. Bagi, Faqir Singh, 1982. "Relationship Between Farm Size And Technical Efficiency In West Tennessee Agriculture," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 14(2), pages 1-6, December.
    3. Stanton, B.F., 1989. "Changes in Farm Size and Structure in American Agriculture in the Twentieth Century," Staff Papers 197561, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    4. Hadrich, Joleen C. & Pendell, Dustin L. & Kim, Youngjune, 2018. "The effect of financial structure and efficiency on Kansas farm growth," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274110, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    5. repec:zbw:iamost:199947 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Saupe, William E., 1980. "Information Needs Relating to Small-Farm Programs and Policies," Economics Statistics and Cooperative Services (ESCS) Reports 329217, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    7. Kim, C.S. & McElroy, Robert G. & Mishra, Ashok K. & Hallahan, Charles B., 2002. "Biased Biased Technological Progress In The U.S. Farm Sector: A Structural Perspective," 2002 Annual Meeting, July 28-31, 2002, Long Beach, California 36526, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    8. El-Osta, Hirsham S. & Johnson, James, 1998. "Determinanats of Financial Performance of Commercial Dairy Farms," Technical Bulletins 184378, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    9. Mbowa, S. & Nieuwoudt, W.L., 1999. "Economies Of Scale For Small And Large Sugar Cane Farms In Kwazulu-Natal," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 38(3).
    10. Temel, Tugrul, 2011. "New facts for old debates: Farm size and productivity in US agriculture," MPRA Paper 31920, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Flinn, William L. & Buttel, Fredrick H., 1980. "Sociological Aspects Of Farm Size: Id Ogical And Social Consequences Of Scale In Agriculture," 1980 Annual Meeting, July 27-30, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois 278979, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    12. Renner, Swetlana, 2014. "Flexibilität von Unternehmen: Eine theoretische und empirische Analyse," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies 199947, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    13. Temel, T. & Lucas, A., 2005. "Deepening the Measuring of Technical Inefficiency in Private Farming in Georgia: Locally Parametric Regression," International Journal of Applied Econometrics and Quantitative Studies, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 2(1), pages 115-138.
    14. Harrington, David H. & Reimund, Donn A. & Baum, Kenneth H. & Peterson, R. Neal, 1983. "U.S. Farming in the Early 1980's: Production and Financial Structure," Agricultural Economic Reports 307951, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    15. Epperson, James E. & Allison, John R., 1980. "Multiple Cropping and Pest Control Intensity -- Preliminary Economic Results," 1980 Annual Meeting, July 27-30, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois 278420, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    16. Jensen, Harald R., 1982. "Another Look at Economies of Size Studies in Farming," Economic Reports 8482, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    17. Peterson, R. Neal & Brooks, Nora L., 1993. "The Changing Concentration of U.S. Agricultural Production during the 20th Century: 14th Annual Report to the Congress on the Status of the Family Farm," Agricultural Information Bulletins 309686, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    18. Renner, Swetlana, 2014. "Flexibilität in Unternehmen: Eine theoretische und empirische Analyse," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 75, number 75.
    19. Fernandez-Cornejo, J. & Gempesaw, C. M., II & Elterich, J. G. & Stefanou, S. E., 1990. "Dynamic Measures Of Scope And Scale Economies And The Dynamic Theory Of The Firm," 1990 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Vancouver, Canada 270865, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    20. Gallacher, Marcos, 1995. "The management factor in developing-country agriculture: Argentina," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 25-38.
    21. Silvia Ștefania Maican & Andreea Cipriana Muntean & Carmen Adina Paștiu & Sebastian Stępień & Jan Polcyn & Iulian Bogdan Dobra & Mălina Dârja & Claudia Olimpia Moisă, 2021. "Motivational Factors, Job Satisfaction, and Economic Performance in Romanian Small Farms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uerser:307953. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.