IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/saea18/266574.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Understanding the Issues Faced by Tennessee Farmers in Adopting Organic Practices

Author

Listed:
  • Liyanage, Kumuditha Hikkaduwa Epa
  • Bhavsar, Hiren A

Abstract

The demand for the organic food has increased over the last few years in the USA but organic crop production is not increasing proportionally. In Tennessee numbers of certified organic farms are very low. This study attempts to identify and analyze fruit and vegetable farmers’ perceptions towards organic farming in Tennessee. Two hundred and fifty conventional and organic farmers were randomly selected from the Pick Tennessee products database. From the responses of 116 farmers revealed that 65% of respondents are following organic farming practices. Also, all the eight variables selected as farmers’ perceptions towards organic farming were affected growing practices. There were significant relationships (p≤ 0.05) between some growing practices and perceptions. Most of the organic farmers have identified high cost, labor intensity, pest and disease problems and certification process as challenges to continue organic farming. Conventional farmers have identified high cost of production, time consuming as some of major barriers to enter organic farming. Factors such as producing vegetables, farming experience, hours work per week on farm, gender, annual cash farm income contributed significantly to the adoption of organic farming.

Suggested Citation

  • Liyanage, Kumuditha Hikkaduwa Epa & Bhavsar, Hiren A, 2018. "Understanding the Issues Faced by Tennessee Farmers in Adopting Organic Practices," 2018 Annual Meeting, February 2-6, 2018, Jacksonville, Florida 266574, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:saea18:266574
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.266574
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/266574/files/TSU%20PAPER.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/266574/files/TSU%20PAPER.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.266574?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vandeveer, Monte L., 2001. "Demand for area crop insurance among litchi producers in northern Vietnam," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 26(2), pages 173-184, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fahad, Shah & Wang, Jing & Hu, Guangyin & Wang, Hui & Yang, Xiaoying & Shah, Ashfaq Ahmad & Huong, Nguyen Thi Lan & Bilal, Arshad, 2018. "Empirical analysis of factors influencing farmers crop insurance decisions in Pakistan: Evidence from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 459-467.
    2. Isabel Fischer & Tina Beuchelt & Tom Dufhues & Gertrud Buchenrieder, 2010. "Risk management networks of ethnic minorities in Viet Nam," Asia-Pacific Development Journal, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), vol. 17(2), pages 83-118, December.
    3. Mohammed, M.A. & Ortmann, Gerald F., 2005. "Factors influencing adoption of livestock insurance by commercial dairy farmers in three Zobatat of Eritrea," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 44(2), pages 1-15, June.
    4. Xiaojuan Yang & Yuan Liu & Wei Bai & Buchun Liu, 2015. "Evaluation of the crop insurance management for soybean risk of natural disasters in Jilin Province, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 76(1), pages 587-599, March.
    5. Ming Wang & Tao Ye & Peijun Shi, 2016. "Factors Affecting Farmers’ Crop Insurance Participation in China," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 64(3), pages 479-492, September.
    6. Chunli, Wan & Dongli, Wu, 2021. "Nonparametric Estimation of Farmers’ Willingness to Accept: Implication for Calculating Crop Insurance Amount," 2021 ASAE 10th International Conference (Virtual), January 11-13, Beijing, China 329428, Asian Society of Agricultural Economists (ASAE).
    7. Ranjan Kumar Ghosh & Shweta Gupta & Vartika Singh & Patrick S. Ward, 2021. "Demand for Crop Insurance in Developing Countries: New Evidence from India," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(1), pages 293-320, February.
    8. Mbonane, Nobuhle Duduzile, 2018. "An analysis of farmers’ preferences for crop insurance: a case of maize farmers in Swaziland," Research Theses 334771, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    9. Islam, Md Din II & Rahman, Airin & Sarker, M. Sazzadur Rahman & Luo, Jianchao & Liang, Hu, 2021. "Factors affecting farmers' willingness to adopt crop insurance to manage disaster risk: evidence from Bangladesh," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 24(3), April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Agricultural and Food Policy;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:saea18:266574. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/saeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.