IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/rrsr85/271791.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Risk Concepts Revisited: A Mathematical Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Weiss, Michael D.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Weiss, Michael D., 1985. "Risk Concepts Revisited: A Mathematical Approach," Regional Research Projects > 1985: S-180 Annual Meeting, March 24-27, 1985, Charleston, South Carolina 271791, Regional Research Projects > S-180: An Economic Analysis of Risk Management Strategies for Agricultural Production Firms.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:rrsr85:271791
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.271791
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/271791/files/SrnRegPrj-110.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/271791/files/SrnRegPrj-110.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.271791?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Masson, Robert T, 1974. "Utility Functions with Jump Discontinuities: Some Evidence and Implications from Peasant Agriculture," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 12(4), pages 559-566, December.
    2. Grandmont, Jean-Michel, 1972. "Continuity properties of a von Neumann-Morgenstern utility," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 45-57, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dubra, Juan & Maccheroni, Fabio & Ok, Efe A., 2004. "Expected utility theory without the completeness axiom," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 118-133, March.
    2. Ichiishi, Tatsuro, 1985. "Management versus ownership, II," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 115-138, March.
    3. Weiss, Michael D., 1985. "Discontinuous Utility In Agricultural Risk Modeling," 1985 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Ames, Iowa 278524, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    4. Lorenzo Bastianello & Marco LiCalzi, 2015. "Target-based solutions for Nash bargaining," Working Papers 5, Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    5. Loehman, Edna, 1985. "Discussion: Risk Concepts Revisited: A Mathematical Approach," Regional Research Projects > 1985: S-180 Annual Meeting, March 24-27, 1985, Charleston, South Carolina 271792, Regional Research Projects > S-180: An Economic Analysis of Risk Management Strategies for Agricultural Production Firms.
    6. Mariapia MENDOLA, 2005. "Farm households production theories: a review of institutional and behavioural responses," Departmental Working Papers 2005-01, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    7. de Courson, Benoît & Frankenhuis, Willem & Nettle, Daniel, 2024. "Poverty is associated with both risk avoidance and risk taking: an empirical test of the desperation threshold model," SocArXiv gqjkm, Center for Open Science.
    8. Ha-Huy, Thai & Le Van, Cuong & Tran-Viet, Cuong, 2018. "Arbitrage and equilibrium in economies with short-selling and ambiguity," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 95-100.
    9. Pivato, Marcus & Vergopoulos, Vassili, 2017. "Subjective expected utility representations for Savage preferences on topological spaces," MPRA Paper 77359, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Hara, Kazuhiro, 2016. "Characterization of stationary preferences in a continuous time framework," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 34-43.
    11. Bultel, Dirk, 2001. "Continuous linear utility for preferences on convex sets in normed real vector spaces," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 89-98, July.
    12. Epstein, Larry G. & Seo, Kyoungwon, 2009. "Subjective states: A more robust model," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 408-427, November.
    13. Craig S. Webb, 2023. "Dynamic Preference Foundations of Expected Exponentially-Discounted Utility," Economics Discussion Paper Series 2303, Economics, The University of Manchester.
    14. Calvet, Laurent-Emmanuel & Grandmont, Jean-Michel & Lemaire, Isabelle, 2018. "Aggregation of heterogenous beliefs, asset pricing, and risk sharing in complete financial markets," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 117-146.
    15. Thai Ha-Huy & Cuong Le Van & Frank Page & Myrna Wooders, 2017. "No-arbitrage and Equilibrium in Finite Dimension: A General Result," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01529663, HAL.
    16. Dillenberger, David & Vijay Krishna, R., 2014. "Expected utility without bounds—A simple proof," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 143-147.
    17. Allouch, Nizar & Le Van, Cuong & Page, Frank H., Jr., 2002. "Arbitrage, Equilibrium, and Nonsatiation," Economic Research Papers 269411, University of Warwick - Department of Economics.
    18. Fabio Maccheroni, 2004. "Yaari's dual theory without the completeness axiom," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 23(3), pages 701-714, March.
    19. Mongin, Philipppe & Fleurbaey, Marc, 2011. "The relevance of utilirianism," HEC Research Papers Series 955, HEC Paris.
    20. Traeger, Christian P., 2011. "Subjective Risk, Confidence, and Ambiguity," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt0gw7t7vn, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:rrsr85:271791. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.