IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/333272.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

From incineration to recycling – An economic and environmental assessment of circular economy of plastics in Finland

Author

Listed:
  • Savolainen, Hannu
  • Honkatukia, Juha

Abstract

In circular economy, the value of products, materials and resources is maintained as long as possible. This is done by minimizing the waste generation by using production side flows as resources and reusing and recycling products. The recycling and other waste management actions are in the heart of CE. In this paper we perform a scenario assessment of increased plastic waste recycling in Finland by using environmentally-extended CGE model. Impacts on aggregate economic outcome, growth contributions and value chains are in the focus. We also shed light on the need for policy instruments to enable such a change in plastic waste treatment from incineration to recycling and secondary material manufacturing. Economic indicators are combined with environmental indicators including material use and greenhouse gas emissions. In all three scenarios the costs of increased recycling exceeded the increased production in waste management sector. Overall effect on GDP was negative in every scenario, but least in the case where domestic plastics were subsidized over imported plastics. In this scenario material flow impacts were also favorable, since imported materials were substituted with recycled materials. We could not find a win-win situation where both economic impacts and environmental consequences were simultaneously positive.

Suggested Citation

  • Savolainen, Hannu & Honkatukia, Juha, 2021. "From incineration to recycling – An economic and environmental assessment of circular economy of plastics in Finland," Conference papers 333272, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:333272
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/333272/files/10510.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew McCarthy & Rob Dellink & Ruben Bibas, 2018. "The Macroeconomics of the Circular Economy Transition: A Critical Review of Modelling Approaches," OECD Environment Working Papers 130, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Samuel Draycott & Iwona Szadkowska & Marta Silva & David M Ingram, 2018. "Assessing the Macro-Economic Benefit of Installing a Farm of Oscillating Water Columns in Scotland and Portugal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Edgar Battand Towa Kouokam & Vanessa Zeller & Wouter Achten, 2019. "Input-output models and waste management analysis: A critical review," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/359535, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    3. Carlos Pablo Sigüenza & Bernhard Steubing & Arnold Tukker & Glenn A. Aguilar‐Hernández, 2021. "The environmental and material implications of circular transitions: A diffusion and product‐life‐cycle‐based modeling framework," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(3), pages 563-579, June.
    4. Stefan Pauliuk & Tomer Fishman & Niko Heeren & Peter Berrill & Qingshi Tu & Paul Wolfram & Edgar G. Hertwich, 2021. "Linking service provision to material cycles: A new framework for studying the resource efficiency–climate change (RECC) nexus," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(2), pages 260-273, April.
    5. António Mateus & Luís Martins, 2021. "Building a mineral-based value chain in Europe: the balance between social acceptance and secure supply," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 34(2), pages 239-261, July.
    6. OCOLIȘANU Andreea & DOBROTĂ Gabriela & AGÂRBICEANU Marcela Simona, 2022. "The Implications Of The Circular Economy On Sustainable Economic Growth," Management of Sustainable Development, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 14(1), pages 16-21, June.
    7. Egger, Peter & Keuschnigg, Christian, 2023. "Resource Dependence, Recycling, and Trade," Economics Working Paper Series 2306, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science.
    8. Rajesh Buch & Alicia Marseille & Matthew Williams & Rimjhim Aggarwal & Aparna Sharma, 2021. "From Waste Pickers to Producers: An Inclusive Circular Economy Solution through Development of Cooperatives in Waste Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-9, August.
    9. Hale Çetinay & Franco Donati & Reinout Heijungs & Benjamin Sprecher, 2020. "Efficient computation of environmentally extended input–output scenario and circular economy modeling," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(5), pages 976-985, October.
    10. Bongers, Anelí & Casas, Pablo, 2022. "The circular economy and the optimal recycling rate: A macroeconomic approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    11. Franco Donati & Sidney Niccolson & Arjan de Koning & Bart Daniels & Maarten Christis & Katrien Boonen & Theo Geerken & João F. D. Rodrigues & Arnold Tukker, 2021. "Modeling the circular economy in environmentally extended input–output: A web application," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(1), pages 36-50, February.
    12. Edgar Towa & Vanessa Zeller & Stefano Merciai & Jannick Schmidt & Wouter M. J. Achten, 2022. "Toward the development of subnational hybrid input–output tables in a multiregional framework," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(1), pages 88-106, February.
    13. Kirsten S. Wiebe & Vibeke S. Norstebø & Fabian R. Aponte & Moana S. Simas & Tina Andersen & Gerardo A. Perez-Valdes, 2023. "Circular Economy and the triple bottom line in Norway," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    14. Joris Baars & Mohammad Ali Rajaeifar & Oliver Heidrich, 2022. "Quo vadis MFA? Integrated material flow analysis to support material efficiency," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(4), pages 1487-1503, August.
    15. Vesna Alivojvodic & Filip Kokalj, 2024. "Drivers and Barriers for the Adoption of Circular Economy Principles towards Efficient Resource Utilisation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-16, February.
    16. Lessard, Jean-Martin & Habert, Guillaume & Tagnit-Hamou, Arezki & Amor, Ben, 2021. "A time-series material-product chain model extended to a multiregional industrial symbiosis: The case of material circularity in the cement sector," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    17. Patrick Elf & Andrea Werner & Sandy Black, 2022. "Advancing the circular economy through dynamic capabilities and extended customer engagement: Insights from small sustainable fashion enterprises in the UK," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(6), pages 2682-2699, September.
    18. Jason Hickel & Stéphane Hallegatte, 2022. "Can we live within environmental limits and still reduce poverty? Degrowth or decoupling?," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(1), January.
    19. Edgar Battand Towa Kouokam & Vanessa Zeller & Stefano Merciai & Wouter Achten, 2021. "Regional waste footprint and waste treatments analysis," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/332189, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    20. Ronny Meglin & Susanne Kytzia & Guillaume Habert, 2022. "Regional circular economy of building materials: Environmental and economic assessment combining Material Flow Analysis, Input‐Output Analyses, and Life Cycle Assessment," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(2), pages 562-576, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Environmental Economics and Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:333272. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.