IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/nzar05/98502.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Hedonic Price Analysis for the New Zealand Wine Industry: Preliminary Results

Author

Listed:
  • Bicknell, Kathryn
  • Friesen, Lana
  • MacDonald, Ian

Abstract

This paper presents preliminary results from a hedonic price analysis of premium wines in New Zealand over the vintages 1994 – 2003. Implicit prices are presented for a sensory quality rating, as well as wine variety and regional reputation. Results show that the price premium associated with Michael Cooper's five-star quality rating is highly significant and increasing in magnitude over the study period. Trends in regional and varietal preferences are also explored.

Suggested Citation

  • Bicknell, Kathryn & Friesen, Lana & MacDonald, Ian, 2005. "A Hedonic Price Analysis for the New Zealand Wine Industry: Preliminary Results," 2005 Conference, August 26-27, 2005, Nelson, New Zealand 98502, New Zealand Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:nzar05:98502
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.98502
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/98502/files/2005-10-hedonic%20price%20analysis%20for%20nz%20wine%20industry.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.98502?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fleming, Euan & Mounter, Stuart & Grant, Bligh & Griffith, Garry, 2014. "Can we explain variations in winery ratings in Victoria?," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 22, pages 1-13.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:nzar05:98502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nzareea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.