IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/nddaer/23117.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Distribution Costs for Dry Fertilizer Cooperatives

Author

Listed:
  • Dahl, Bruce L.
  • Cobia, David W.
  • Dooley, Frank J.

Abstract

Economic-engineering cost data and a simulation model was used to analyze the impact of sales area size and volume and equipment configuration on costs of custom application of bulk fertilizer by cooperatives. Fixed costs accounted for most of the custom application costs regardless of sales density or size of sales area for the relevant range of these variables in North Dakota. Increasing the radius of a sales area from 5 miles to 50 miles increased average costs by $2.79/ton to $32.26 per ton in Eastern North Dakota. Doubling sales by either doubling the size of the sales area or the sales density reduced average total costs by over a third for the smallest plant (500-ton storage) and over 40% for a 2,000-ton plant. Therefore, substantial savings, $166,800/year in one scenario, can be realized by some sort of consolidation. Although storage capacity placed little restriction on volume, more storage capacity than what is required for operations was recommended because of uncertainty in delivery during peak demand periods. Evaluating this type of risk was beyond the scope of this research.

Suggested Citation

  • Dahl, Bruce L. & Cobia, David W. & Dooley, Frank J., 1995. "Distribution Costs for Dry Fertilizer Cooperatives," Agricultural Economics Reports 23117, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:nddaer:23117
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.23117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/23117/files/aer339.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.23117?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lahlum, Suzanne M. & Dooley, Frank J., 1996. "The Optimal Number and Size of Fertilizer Plants Under Hazardous Materials Regulations," MPC Reports 231704, North Dakota State University, Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute.
    2. Kenkel, Philip L. & Kilima, Fredy, 2004. "Optimal Fertilizer Warehousing and Distribution Systems for Farm Supply Cooperatives," 2004 Annual Meeting, November 2-3 31795, NCERA-194 Research on Cooperatives.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:nddaer:23117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dandsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.