IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/gewi12/137161.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Sozialwissenschaftliche Agrarforschung – Theorie Und Praxis Am Beispiel Des Innovationsnetzwerkes Inka Bb

Author

Listed:
  • Knierim, Andrea
  • Siart, Sonja
  • Muller, Kathrin
  • Bokelmann, Wolfgang

Abstract

Das Innovationsnetzwerk Klimaanpassung Brandenburg Berlin (INKA BB) hat das Ziel, die Nachhaltigkeit der Land- und Wassernutzung in der Region auch unter veränderten Klimabedingungen zu sichern. Um die transdisziplinäre Zusammenarbeit systematisch umzusetzen und auszuwerten, verfolgt das Verbundvorhaben einen Aktionsforschungsansatz. Der vorliegende Beitrag verdeutlicht die theoretischen Grundlagen und konzeptionellen Annahmen des sozialwissenschaftlichen Forschungsansatzes und leitet daraus eine methodische Herangehensweise ab. Eine besondere Herausforderung besteht in der Operationalisierung des Veränderungsprozesses anhand sinnhafter Beobachtungskategorien und Indikatoren Am Beispiel von INKA BB werden methodischen Interventionen zur Entwicklung von Anpassungsstrategien und zur Förderung der Netzwerkentwicklung durch Feedback und Reflexionsprozesse präsentiert und einer Auswertung unterzogen. Dabei lassen sich die forschungstechnischen Möglichkeiten und Grenzen dieser Vorgehensweise ansatzweise abschätzen. Abschließend erfolgt eine Einordnung des integrativen Forschungsansatzes als sozialwissenschaftliche Methodik für eine systemorientierte, agrarwissenschaftliche Forschung.

Suggested Citation

  • Knierim, Andrea & Siart, Sonja & Muller, Kathrin & Bokelmann, Wolfgang, 2012. "Sozialwissenschaftliche Agrarforschung – Theorie Und Praxis Am Beispiel Des Innovationsnetzwerkes Inka Bb," 52nd Annual Conference, Stuttgart, Germany, September 26-28, 2012 137161, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:gewi12:137161
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.137161
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/137161/files/Knierim_et_al_GEWISOLA_2012.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.137161?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Annemarie van Zeijl-Rozema & Ron Cörvers & René Kemp & Pim Martens, 2008. "Governance for sustainable development: a framework," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(6), pages 410-421.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaojun Zhang & Weiqiao Wang & Yunan Bai & Yong Ye, 2022. "How Has China Structured Its Ecological Governance Policy System?—A Case from Fujian Province," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-22, July.
    2. Pim Martens & Mohsin Raza, 2010. "Is Globalisation Sustainable?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-14, January.
    3. Marletto, Gerardo, 2011. "Structure, agency and change in the car regime. A review of the literature," European Transport \ Trasporti Europei, ISTIEE, Institute for the Study of Transport within the European Economic Integration, issue 47, pages 71-88.
    4. Erik Laes & Leen Gorissen & Frank Nevens, 2014. "A Comparison of Energy Transition Governance in Germany, The Netherlands and the United Kingdom," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-24, February.
    5. Reginald Masocha & Olawale Fatoki, 2018. "The Impact of Coercive Pressures on Sustainability Practices of Small Businesses in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-14, August.
    6. Pongsapak Chindasombatcharoen & Pattanaporn Chatjuthamard & Pornsit Jiraporn & Sirimon Treepongkaruna, 2022. "Achieving sustainable development goals through board size and innovation," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), pages 664-677, August.
    7. Jan-Peter Voß & Adrian Smith & John Grin, 2009. "Designing long-term policy: rethinking transition management," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 42(4), pages 275-302, November.
    8. John Grin, 2012. "The politics of transition governance in Dutch agriculture. Conceptual understanding and implications for transition management," International Journal of Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(1/2), pages 72-89.
    9. Eva Heiskanen & Sirkku Kivisaari & Raimo Lovio & Per Mickwitz, 2009. "Designed to travel? Transition management encounters environmental and innovation policy histories in Finland," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 42(4), pages 409-427, November.
    10. Bokyong Shin & Mikko Rask, 2021. "Assessment of Online Deliberative Quality: New Indicators Using Network Analysis and Time-Series Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, January.
    11. Katharina Spraul & Annegret Höfert, 2021. "Governance for Sustainability: Patterns of Regulation and Self-Regulation in the German Wine Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-25, March.
    12. Walter Leal Filho & Amanda Lange Salvia & Fernanda Frankenberger & Noor Adelyna Mohammed Akib & Salil K. Sen & Subarna Sivapalan & Isabel Novo-Corti & Madhavi Venkatesan & Kay Emblen-Perry, 2021. "Governance and sustainable development at higher education institutions," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 6002-6020, April.
    13. Purkus, Alexandra & Lüdtke, Jan, 2020. "A systemic evaluation framework for a multi-actor, forest-based bioeconomy governance process: The German Charter for Wood 2.0 as a case study," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    14. Liviu Moldovan, 2015. "Sustainability Assessment Framework for VET Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-19, June.
    15. de Aguiar, Thereza R.S. & Freire, Fatima de Souza, 2017. "Shifts in modes of governance and sustainable development in the Brazilian oil sector," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 701-710.
    16. Tolulope Osinubi & Ajayi Adedoyin & Osinubi Olufemi & Folorunsho Ajide, 2023. "Does Tourism Affect Sustainable Development in MINT Countries?," Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, Emerging Markets Forum, vol. 15(1), pages 72-92, January.
    17. Corina Rădulescu & Rita Toader & Gratiela Boca & Madela Abrudan & Cristian Anghel & Diana Cezara Toader, 2015. "Sustainable Development in Maramures County," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-22, June.
    18. Natalia Eernstman & Arjen E.J. Wals, 2013. "Locative Meaning-making: An Arts-based Approach to Learning for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-16, April.
    19. René Kemp, 2010. "Sustainable technologies do not exist!," EKONOMIAZ. Revista vasca de Economía, Gobierno Vasco / Eusko Jaurlaritza / Basque Government, vol. 75(04), pages 22-39.
    20. Luìs, Galindo & Giulio, Guarini & Gabriel, Porcile, 2020. "Environmental innovations, income distribution, international competitiveness and environmental policies: a Kaleckian growth model with a balance of payments constraint," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 16-25.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Research Methods/ Statistical Methods;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:gewi12:137161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gewisea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.