IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/faopwp/23762.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Review of Household Poultry Production as a Tool in Poverty Reduction with Focus on Bangladesh and India

Author

Listed:
  • Dolberg, Frands

Abstract

This Working Paper for the South Asia regional hub of the Pro-Poor Livestock Policy Initiative presents the case for using poultry, in very small units of 5-10 adult birds, as a means of alleviating the poverty of rural women in the region. Policies and procedures that affect the success of such initiatives are examined. The author draws on personal experience and an extensive literature review. The main focus of the paper is a review of what is known as the Bangladesh Model. Emphasising that this is not a static model, the author explains its evolution by Bangladesh's largest NGO, BRAC, working with the government department responsible for livestock services. The main feature of the model is that the supply of inputs and services are turned into income earning opportunities for poor people. The focus is on poverty reduction, rather than on increasing the supply of eggs and poultry meat. The main components are the involvement of NGOs that have access to groups of very poor women, the provision by NGOs of micro-credit and training to help groups establish small, semi-scavenging, egg-laying units, and special training for poultry workers, feed distributors and egg traders. The Bangladesh model has been incorporated into several major, Danida-sponsored development projects. The paper includes a discussion of its impact on poor families, and the policy and institutional implications that have arisen, in particular the role of government support in terms of the provision of veterinary and other services, research and training. The Bangladesh experience is contrasted to that of India where, in some States, the commercial sector has a strong presence. The author recommends that a survey be undertaken in India and Nepal that should examine livestock policies at (selected) State and at central level. The experiences of NGOs that have used poultry as a means of alleviating poverty should be explored and also the degree to which understanding, skills and knowledge exist in organisations responsible for policy, field level implementation, and research and training.

Suggested Citation

  • Dolberg, Frands, 2003. "A Review of Household Poultry Production as a Tool in Poverty Reduction with Focus on Bangladesh and India," PPLPI Working Papers 23762, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Pro-Poor Livestock Policy Initiative.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:faopwp:23762
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.23762
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/23762/files/wp030006.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.23762?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zoƫ A Campbell & Thomas L Marsh & Emmanuel A Mpolya & Samuel M Thumbi & Guy H Palmer, 2018. "Newcastle disease vaccine adoption by smallholder households in Tanzania: Identifying determinants and barriers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Iqbal, Kazi & Toufique , Kazi Ali & Hossain, Monzur, 2011. "Mis-targeting and Mis-using Microcredit in Livestock Development Projects in Bangladesh," Bangladesh Development Studies, Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies (BIDS), vol. 34(3), pages 55-72, September.
    3. Bijla, S, 2018. "Dynamic poverty processes in rural India and the role of livestock," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 31(2).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:faopwp:23762. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/faoooit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.