IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eaa113/57997.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The influence of country of origin on German consumer preferences for peaches: a latent class choice model

Author

Listed:
  • Cembalo, Luigi
  • Cicia, Gianni
  • Del Giudice, Teresa

Abstract

Germany is an important world level market for fresh fruit. Spain and Italy are the main suppliers of fresh fruit on the German market while the main imported products are apple, grapes, peaches and oranges. The aim of this paper is to assess the role country of origin plays in the preferences of German consumers for peaches. Since German legislation requires fresh fruit sold on the market to clearly display the product’s country of origin, German consumers usually make their choice with this information to hand. How important is such information, and what is the trade-off between country of origin and price or organic production system? We attempted to investigate such concerns through a choice experiment approach conducted by means of a questionnaire-based survey administered to a representative sample of 300 German households. In the experiment, respondents were asked to choose their favorite peach among four alternatives. Each peach was described as imported from four specific countries (Italy, Spain, Turkey and France) and available at a specific price; some of the peaches were certified Organic or PDO. The stated choices are analyzed using a latent class choice model to derive estimates of preferences for peaches. Results indicate the presence of three distinct consumer segments in the German peach market. The largest segment (48%) showed a strong preference for Italian peaches as well as for organic and PDO certification. For this segment, price was not an important attribute. The second segment (41%) showed a strong preference for Spanish produce and organic certification. Price was important in this case. The third segment (11%) had a negative preference for Italian and Spanish peaches, with price being the main attribute.

Suggested Citation

  • Cembalo, Luigi & Cicia, Gianni & Del Giudice, Teresa, 2009. "The influence of country of origin on German consumer preferences for peaches: a latent class choice model," 113th Seminar, September 3-6, 2009, Chania, Crete, Greece 57997, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:eaa113:57997
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.57997
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/57997/files/Cicia.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.57997?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kloeckner, Heike & Langen, Nina & Hartmann, Monika, 2011. "Can COO Labeling be a Means of Pepper Differentiation: Quality Expectation and Taste Experience," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 115963, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Evelyne Gbénou-Sissinto & Ygué P. Adegbola & Gauthier Biaou & Roch C. Zossou, 2018. "Farmers’ Willingness to Pay for New Storage Technologies for Maize in Northern and Central Benin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, August.
    3. Segla Roch Cedrique Zossou & Patrice Ygue Adegbola & Brice Tiburce Oussou & Gustave Dagbenonbakin & Roch Mongbo, 2021. "Modelling smallholder farmers’ preferences for soil fertility management technologies in Benin: A stated preference approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-25, June.
    4. Chiedza Zvirurami Tsvakirai & Teboho Jeremiah Mosikari, 2020. "Investigating South Africa’s Fresh Peach and Nectarine Value Proposition: Measuring Progress on Achieving Sustainable Consumption in Exports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-13, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eaa113:57997. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.