IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eaa105/7850.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Consumers' Willingness To Pay for Value-Added Food Products; Abstract Only

Author

Listed:
  • Tsakiridou, Efthimia
  • Mattas, Konstadinos
  • Mpletsa, Zoi

Abstract

The increasing importance of food quality and food safety has led to an increased consumer concern for certified quality products. However, the market share of certified quality products still remains very small. The aspect of "quality" has also been accepted as an important ingredient of marketing that offers producers a great opportunity to differentiate themselves in the market and add value to their products (Jervell and Borgen, 2004). In the case of agricultural products producers may view a quality certification (either it is a certification of traceability or a quality label) as a tool that protects them in an environment of distrust and as a promotion strategy that will add value to their products and justify higher prices for them. However, in order for value-added markets to be successful an effective communication must be promoted. This means, that consumers must be aware of the existence and meaning of these commodities and also have a favorable attitude towards them. In addition, consumers must be willing to pay an extra amount of money for such products. It is therefore, of major importance to better communicate with the consumers and gain a better understanding of their attitudes, needs and perceptions (Preston and McGuirk, 1990; Kuznesof et al., 1997; Walley et al., 1999; Van Ittersum et al., 2000; Grunert, 2002; McEachern and Willock, 2004). The aim of this paper is to examine consumer attitudes and behaviour towards two different quality foods: the organic and the traditional speciality guaranteed (TSG) products. A survey of Greek consumers was carried out to examine perceptions of food quality, level of awareness and attitudes towards food certification. Furthermore, an attempt is made to compare the socioeconomic characteristics and attitudes that affect consumers' willingness to pay (WTP) a premium for these two different food products. Data were collected in February 2006, using a cross-sectional questionnaire survey. The survey took place in the metropolitan area of Thessaloniki (northern Greece) and only those consumers who were responsible for purchasing their household's food were interviewed. In total, 414 valid questionnaires were used in the analysis. Results indicate the high level of consumer awareness and knowledge about organic and TSG products. The majority of consumers are buyers of organic and of TSG products (55 per cent and 67 per cent respectively). Sociodemographic factors (gender, age) are positively associated to consumers' willingness to pay a premium for organic products, whereas nutrition and freshness positively affect consumers' willingness to pay for TSG products. The findings are considered to be useful to food policy makers and marketing practitioners, since effective methods of marketing would increase the demand of the studied products

Suggested Citation

  • Tsakiridou, Efthimia & Mattas, Konstadinos & Mpletsa, Zoi, 2007. "Consumers' Willingness To Pay for Value-Added Food Products; Abstract Only," 105th Seminar, March 8-10, 2007, Bologna, Italy 7850, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:eaa105:7850
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.7850
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/7850/files/cp070021.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.7850?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eaa105:7850. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.