IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/auagpe/234412.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Are We Killing the Golden Sheep? The Changing Size and Composition of the Australian Sheep Flock: Implications for Production and Profitability

Author

Listed:
  • Perrett, Edward

Abstract

The changing fortunes of the Australian sheepmeat and wool sectors have led to dramatic changes to the national flock. In recent years the profitability of the sheepmeat sector has provided mixed signals to producers to simultaneously sell to capitalise on high prices, particularly for mutton and breeding stock, while also shifting enterprises towards dual purpose (meat and wool) and specialist lamb production systems. This essay provides a summary of changes to the Australian sheep flock in the past twenty years, including the growth of the sheepmeat sector and the decline of the wool sector. It considers drivers of profitability in the sheep industry, comparing the recent economic performance of prime lamb, dual purpose, and wool flocks. It is suggested that there are a number of common factors evident in the most profitable sheep businesses. A discussion about risk management and volatility helps explain the rise of dual production systems, the persistence of risk-averse wool enterprises, and highly productive but volatile returns for specialist prime lamb producers. Flock structure is identified a major determinant of profitability, with breeding ewes critical to production. The challenges posed will also shape the future of the Australian sheep flock. Fertility and drought-induced sell-off are noted as major factors affecting changes to the Australian flock, which could be exacerbated by an increasingly variable and extreme climate. Finally, this essay considers the future size and composition of the Australian sheep flock. A flock structure model is used to estimate the effects of hypothetical changes to marking and slaughter rates. It is concluded that it remains possible to sustain production and kill the 'Golden Sheep', provided there is a focus on productivity and reproduction efficiency to ‘optimise’ the remaining flock.

Suggested Citation

  • Perrett, Edward, 2015. "Are We Killing the Golden Sheep? The Changing Size and Composition of the Australian Sheep Flock: Implications for Production and Profitability," Papers 234412, University of Melbourne, Melbourne School of Land and Environment.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:auagpe:234412
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.234412
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/234412/files/Paper%20101.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.234412?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hutchings, Timothy R. & Nordblom, Thomas L., 2011. "A financial analysis of the effect of the mix of crop and sheep enterprises on the risk profile of dryland farms in south-eastern Australia," AFBM Journal, Australasian Farm Business Management Network, vol. 8(1), pages 1-23, October.
    2. Hutchings, Timothy R. & Nordblom, Thomas L., 2011. "A financial analysis of the effect of the mix of crop and sheep enterprises on the risk profile of dryland farms in south-eastern Australia," 2011 Conference (55th), February 8-11, 2011, Melbourne, Australia 101405, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael Young & Ross Kingwell & John Young & Phil Vercoe, 2020. "An economic analysis of sheep flock structures for mixed enterprise Australian farm businesses," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(3), pages 677-699, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nordblom, Thomas L. & Penfold, Chris & Weckert, Melanie & Norton, Mark R., 2017. "Straw and living mulches compared with herbicide for under-vine weed control in a Public-Private Benefit Framework," 2017 Conference (61st), February 7-10, 2017, Brisbane, Australia 258677, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    2. Cortez-Arriola, José & Groot, Jeroen C.J. & Rossing, Walter A.H. & Scholberg, Johannes M.S. & Améndola Massiotti, Ricardo D. & Tittonell, Pablo, 2016. "Alternative options for sustainable intensification of smallholder dairy farms in North-West Michoacán, Mexico," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 22-32.
    3. Nordblom, Thomas L. & Hutchings, Timothy R. & Hayes, Richard C. & Li, Guangdi D., 2015. "A Framework for Modelling Whole-Farm Financial Risk," 2015 Conference (59th), February 10-13, 2015, Rotorua, New Zealand 202581, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    4. Kingwell, Ross & Islam, Nazrul & Xayavong, Vilaphonh, 2020. "Farming systems and their business strategies in south-western Australia: A decadal assessment of their profitability," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    5. Sosheel S. Godfrey & Thomas Nordblom & Ryan H. L. Ip & Susan Robertson & Timothy Hutchings & Karl Behrendt, 2021. "Drought Shocks and Gearing Impacts on the Profitability of Sheep Farming," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Nordblom, Thomas L. & Hutchings, Timothy R. & Godfrey, Sosheel S. & Schefe, Cassandra R., 2021. "Precision variable rate nitrogen for dryland farming on waterlogging Riverine Plains of Southeast Australia?," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    7. Bell, L.W. & Moore, A.D. & Thomas, D.T., 2021. "Diversified crop-livestock farms are risk-efficient in the face of price and production variability," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Livestock Production/Industries;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:auagpe:234412. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.agrifood.info/perspectives/index.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.