Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Breeding and feeding pigs in Australia and Vietnam

Contents:

Author Info

  • Tisdell, Clement A.
  • Wilson, Clevo

Abstract

This report establishes that ACIAR Research Project AS2/1994/023, ‘Breeding and feeding pigs in Australia and Vietnam’ (supported by ACIAR from July 1995 to the end of 2000) has yielded an extraordinarily high rate of economic return on the funds invested. The collaborating agencies were the Department of Primary Industries, Queensland, James Cook University and The University of Queensland in Australia, and the Institute of Agricultural Sciences of South Vietnam in Vietnam. The best estimate benefit–cost ratio for investment in this project is at least 159:1 with a corresponding internal rate of return of 900% and a net present value of A$496 million. This is a total value, not an annual value. To give context to the number A$496 m, in 2000, 1.3 million tonnes of pig meat, worth A$2,323 million, was consumed in Vietnam in that year alone. The returns to the project are still significant even when the net present value up to, and including, 2001 is considered. While the breeding and the feeding components of the project had highly favourable levels of economic return, the relative economic returns for the genetic component are considerably higher than the nutrition component. In Vietnam, the project has enabled better quality (less fatty) pork to be produced, has resulted in more favourable feed-conversion ratios in pig husbandry and has reduced the number of sows needed to produce a given annual stock of pigs for slaughter. This is mostly a result of genetic improvements in the Vietnamese pig herd made possible by the import of Australian Yorkshire pigs (also known as Australian Large Whites) from Queensland. These pigs have several genetic advantages in the tropical climate of Vietnam. However, nutrition research has also added to these benefits. As a result of changes in the lysine/energy content of concentrated pig meal for fattening and finishing pigs, it has become possible to produce leaner pork more cost effectively in Vietnam. The new feed formula is being adopted by Vietnamese-owned millers of concentrated pig feed, and benefits should flow to Vietnamese pig farmers. In addition, in the near future, results from the nutrition research component of this project should enable Vietnamese-owned mills to produce concentrated feed for weaner pigs for the first time. To date, this production has been exclusive to foreign-owned mills. Because of the inadequacy of the data available, it was not possible to quantify the benefits to Australia from this project. They are, however, believed to be significant and are listed and discussed. It is pertinent to observe that this project has been very effective as an Australian foreign aid project. It has made possible substantial advances in pig husbandry in Vietnam, and Vietnam has obtained a high level of economic benefits from the project. The project has been well managed with an appropriate level of attention given to diffusion of economic results. With the nutrition component of the research, there has been effective follow-up and liaison with state farms and Vietnamese-owned produce mills to ensure adoption of the more cost-effective pig feed mixtures developed as a result of this research. The extremely high net benefits from the project result from the following factors. First, the genetic material transferred as a part of the research package, namely from Australian Yorkshire pigs of the herd of the Queensland Department of Primary Industries (QDPI), was most appropriate to Vietnamese tropical conditions and was capable of adding both to the quantity and quality of pig production in Vietnam. Second, the transfer of this genetic material was not on a commercial basis but essentially was an aid item. Third, the considerable costs involved in developing the pig herd of QDPI (now sold to private interests in Australia) was not assigned as a cost of this project. They were treated as a sunk cost because they had been incurred before the ACIAR project. Fourth, there was an extremely short lag or gestation period before the flow of benefits or results from this subcomponent in Vietnam. Benefits could be obtained almost immediately. Fifth, effective mechanisms were quickly put into place to help diffuse the superior genes. These included their adoption on state farms, and the construction or reconstruction of five regional artificial insemination (AI) centres and associated improvement in their facilities and the skills of their staff. The latter initiatives were supported by the Australian International Development Assistance Bureau (AusAID), but are not costed against ,the project since the AI centres have multiple uses and they remain as long-term assets for Vietnam.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://purl.umn.edu/47695
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research in its series Impact Assessment Series (IAS) with number 47695.

as in new window
Length:
Date of creation: 2001
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ags:aciias:47695

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.aciar.gov.au/home
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords: pig; Vietnam; Australia; breeding; feeding; high rate of return; high impact; high economic return; DPI QLD; James Cook University; University of QLD; Institute of Agricultural Sciences of South Vietnam; benefit-cost ratio; net present value; internal rate of return; significant returns; genetic; nutrition; pork; Agribusiness; Farm Management; Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety; International Development; Livestock Production/Industries; Production Economics;

References

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. Pearce, David, 2002. "Measuring the poverty impact of ACIAR projects: a broad framework," Impact Assessment Series (IAS) 47697, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.
  2. Warner, Robert & Bauer, Marcia, 2002. "Mama Lus Frut scheme: an assessment of poverty reduction," Impact Assessment Series (IAS) 47698, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.
  3. Pearce, David & Monck, Michael & Chadwick, Kevin & Corbishley, James, 2006. "Benefits to Australia from ACIAR-funded Research," Impact Assessment Series (IAS) 113213, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.
  4. Pearce, David & Monck, Michael, 2006. "Benefits to Australia of selected CABI products," Impact Assessment Series (IAS) 113171, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.
  5. Maredia, Mywish K. & Raitzer, David A., 2012. "Review and analysis of documented patterns of agricultural research impacts in Southeast Asia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 106(1), pages 46-58.
  6. Anonymous, 2006. "ACIAR and Public Funding of R&D: Submission to Productivity Commission Study on Public Support for Science and Innovation," Impact Assessment Series (IAS) 113247, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.
  7. McLeod, Ross, 2003. "Improved Methods for the Diagnosis and Control of Bluetongue in Small Ruminants in Asia and the Epidemiology and Control of Bovine Ephemeral Fever in China," Impact Assessment Series (IAS) 113226, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.
  8. Corbishley, James & Pearce, David, 2006. "Zero Tillage for Weed Control in India: the Contribution to Poverty Alleviation," Impact Assessment Series (IAS) 113172, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.
  9. McLeod, Ross, 2003. "Improved Methods in Diagnosis, Epidemiology, and Information Management of Foot-and-Mouth Disease in Southeast Asia," Impact Assessment Series (IAS) 113248, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.
  10. van Bueren, Martin, 2004. "Acacia Hybrids in Vietnam," Impact Assessment Series (IAS) 113223, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.
  11. Bauer, Marcia & Pearce, David & Vincent, David P., 2003. "Saving a Staple Crop: Impact of Biological Control of the Banana Skipper on Poverty Reduction in Papua New Guinea," Impact Assessment Series (IAS) 113227, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.
  12. Jiang, Tingsong & Pearce, David, 2005. "Shelf-life Extension of Leafy Vegetables: Evaluating the Impacts," Impact Assessment Series (IAS) 113218, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.
  13. Clevo Wilson & Clem Tisdell, 2005. "Globalisation, Concentration Of Genetic Material And Their Implications For Sustainable Development," School of Economics and Finance Discussion Papers and Working Papers Series 198, School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology.
  14. van Bueren, Martin, 2004. "Eucalypt Tree Improvement in China," Impact Assessment Series (IAS) 113221, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.
  15. Pearce, David, 2005. "Identifying the Sex Pheromone of the Sugarcane Borer Moth Economic impact of ACIAR project CS2/1991/680," Impact Assessment Series (IAS) 113216, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aciias:47695. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.