IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aare97/136222.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Chemical Residues in the Australian Beef Industry: Assessing the Economic Impacts of the Chlorfluazuron Incident on Returns to Cattle Producers

Author

Listed:
  • Hill, Debbie J.
  • Griffith, Garry R.
  • Piggott, Roley R.

Abstract

The chlorfluzuron incident is just one of a number of chemical residue incidents that have plagued the Australian beef industry since the late 1980s. The frequency and diversity of residue episodes in Australia have served to illustrate the potential of agricultural and veterinary chemicals to cause considerable disruption to Australia's meat trade, even when the chemicals do not pose a health risk to consumers. For example, the discovery of chlorfluazuron residues in Australian beef in 1994 resulted in an export ban being placed on beef containing chlorofluazuron residues. While it is believed that residues in Australian beef can result in significant losses to the Australian cattle industry, a detailed economic evaluation of the cost of a residue incident has not been undertaken. A major aim of this study is to develop an economic model that can be used to assess the economic impact of any chemical residue incident on any agricultural industry, with an emphasis on producer returns, and to illustrate the general applicability of the model by using it to assess the economic impact of the chlorfluazuron incident on returns to australian beef cattle producers. This is done within a multiple-product, multiple-market framework, where the presence of chlorfluazuron residues in cattle is modelled as a shift in supply from one market segment to another.

Suggested Citation

  • Hill, Debbie J. & Griffith, Garry R. & Piggott, Roley R., 1997. "Chemical Residues in the Australian Beef Industry: Assessing the Economic Impacts of the Chlorfluazuron Incident on Returns to Cattle Producers," 1997 Conference (41st), January 22-24, 1997, Gold Coast, Australia 136222, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aare97:136222
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.136222
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/136222/files/fiche009-report069.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.136222?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aare97:136222. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaresea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.