IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea19/291206.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Power Law Distribution of Agricultural Land Size

Author

Listed:
  • Akhundjanov, Sherzod B.
  • Chamberlain, Lauren

Abstract

Power-law distributions explain a variety of natural and man-made processes spanning various disciplines including economics and finance. This paper demonstrates that the distribution of agricultural land size in the United States is best described by a power-law distribution. Maximum likelihood estimation is carried out using county-level data of over 3000 observations gathered at five-year intervals by the USDA Census of Agriculture. Our analysis indicates that U.S. agricultural land size is heavy-tailed, that variance estimates generally do not converge, and that the top 5% of agricultural counties account for about 25% of agricultural land between 1997 and 2012. The goodness of fit of power-law distribution is evaluated using likelihood ratio tests and regression-based diagnostics. The power-law distribution of farm size has important implications for the design of more efficient regional and national agricultural policies as counties close to the mean account for little of the cumulative distribution of total agricultural land.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Akhundjanov, Sherzod B. & Chamberlain, Lauren, 2019. "The Power Law Distribution of Agricultural Land Size," 2019 Annual Meeting, July 21-23, Atlanta, Georgia 291206, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea19:291206
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.291206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/291206/files/Abstracts_19_04_14_18_33_45_05__129_123_204_8_0.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.291206?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Małgorzata Just & Krzysztof Echaust, 2021. "An Optimal Tail Selection in Risk Measurement," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Sherzod B. Akhundjanov & Tatiana Drugova, 2022. "On the growth process of US agricultural land," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 1727-1740, September.
    3. Behzod B. Ahundjanov & Sherzod B. Akhundjanov & Botir B. Okhunjanov, 2022. "Power law in COVID‐19 cases in China," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(2), pages 699-719, April.
    4. Kimsanova, Barchynai & Herzfeld, Thomas, 2022. "Policy analysis with Melitz-type gravity model: Evidence from Kyrgyzstan," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 80.
    5. Sherzod B. Akhundjanov & Alexis Akira Toda, 2020. "Is Gibrat’s “Economic Inequality” lognormal?," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 59(5), pages 2071-2091, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Research Methods/ Statistical Methods;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea19:291206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.