IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea15/205636.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Food waste: The role of date labels, package size, and product category

Author

Listed:
  • Wilson, Norbert L.W.
  • Rickard, Bradley J.
  • Saputo, Rachel
  • Ho, Shuay-Tsyr

Abstract

The presence of food waste, and ways to reduce food waste, has generated significant debate among industry stakeholders, policy makers, and consumer groups in the United States and elsewhere. Many have argued that the variety of date labels used by food manufacturers leads to confusion about food quality and food safety among consumers. Here we develop a laboratory experiment with treatments that expose subjects to different date labels (Sell by, Best by, Use by, and Fresh by) for six food products; we include both small and large-sized ready-to-eat cereal, salad greens, and yogurt. Our results show that, holding other observed factors constant, that date labels do influence subjects’ value of food waste. We find that subjects will waste food across all date labels, but that the value of waste is greatest in the “Use by” treatment, the date label suggestive of food safety, and lowest for the “Sell by” treatment. Two-way ANOVA tests provide evidence that subjects respond differentially to date labels by product. Pair-wise comparison indicate that the “Sell by” treatment generates a waste value that is different than other date labels. We see subjects have different values of waste depending on date label and product. The value of waste for cereal is more responsive to “Fresh by”; for salad, the value of waste is more responsive to all date labels except for “Fresh by”; for yogurt, subjects adjusted their value of waste the most to the “Sell by” treatment. Date labels influence food waste despite the limited information provided by the labels.

Suggested Citation

  • Wilson, Norbert L.W. & Rickard, Bradley J. & Saputo, Rachel & Ho, Shuay-Tsyr, 2015. "Food waste: The role of date labels, package size, and product category," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 205636, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea15:205636
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.205636
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/205636/files/AAEA%202015%20Food%20Waste%20Poster.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.205636?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. de Gorter, Harry & Drabik, Dusan, 2015. "The Distinct Economic Effects of the Ethanol Blend Wall, RIN Prices and Ethanol Price Premium due to the RFS," Working Papers 250020, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    2. Haroon Bhorat & Ravi Kanbur & Benjamin Stanwix, 2017. "Minimum Wages in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Primer," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 32(1), pages 21-74.
    3. Jovanovic, Nina & Katare, Bhagyashree & Lim, Kar Ho, 2017. "Consumers’ Willingness to Waste Food: Attitude toward Environmentally Responsible Behavior and Food Expiration," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258331, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. Alba J. Collart & Matthew G. Interis, 2018. "Consumer Imperfect Information in the Market for Expired and Nearly Expired Foods and Implications for Reducing Food Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy; Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety; Institutional and Behavioral Economics;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea15:205636. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.