IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea11/103165.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Influence of Course Delivery Method and Proctoring on Performance in Introductory Economics

Author

Listed:
  • Wachenheim, Cheryl J.

Abstract

Student performances on the final exam in introductory economics courses taught online and in the classroom were compared to consider the effect of proctoring the final exam. Students who took a course in the classroom did better on a proctored final exam than those taking the course online. Students in an online class taking a non-proctored final exam online scored more than one full letter grade higher than those taking a proctored final.

Suggested Citation

  • Wachenheim, Cheryl J., 2011. "Influence of Course Delivery Method and Proctoring on Performance in Introductory Economics," 2011 Annual Meeting, July 24-26, 2011, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 103165, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea11:103165
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.103165
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/103165/files/Microsoft%20Word%20-%20AAEA%20Wachenheim%20Paper%202011.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.103165?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Teaching/Communication/Extension/Profession;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea11:103165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.