IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/zbw/hiclch/209282.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Material Requirements Planning under Phase-out Conditions

In: Operational Excellence in Logistics and Supply Chains: Optimization Methods, Data-driven Approaches and Security Insights. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), Vol. 22

Author

Listed:
  • Wagner, Regina
  • Blecker, Thorsten

Abstract

In today's production environment with shortened product lifecycles, phase-outs, i.e. product elimination from production, become regular events. Badly planned phase-outs lead to high remaining stock levels after end of production, causing immense sunk costs. Previously performed 26 interviews revealed that this is a major challenge in current production (Grussenmeyer and Blecker, 2014; Grussenmeyer, Gencay and Blecker, 2014). Therefore, the objective of this paper is to develop a material requirements planning focusing on remaining stock induced costs during phase-out to plan optimal phase-out quantity and phase-out date. The research is conceptually driven and proposes an example of the methodology.

Suggested Citation

  • Wagner, Regina & Blecker, Thorsten, 2015. "Material Requirements Planning under Phase-out Conditions," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Blecker, Thorsten & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Operational Excellence in Logistics and Supply Chains: Optimization Methods, Data-driven Approaches and Security Insights. Proceedings of the Hamburg , volume 22, pages 73-95, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:hiclch:209282
    DOI: 10.15480/882.1265
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/209282/1/hicl-2015-22-073.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15480/882.1265?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. K Sahyouni & R C Savaskan & M S Daskin, 2010. "The effect of lifetime buys on warranty repair operations," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(5), pages 790-803, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Jiguang & Hu, Qiying, 2015. "Optimal payment scheme when the supplier’s quality level and cost are unknown," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(3), pages 731-742.
    2. Jessika Luth Richter & Sahra Svensson‐Hoglund & Carl Dalhammar & Jennifer D. Russell & Åke Thidell, 2023. "Taking stock for repair and refurbishing: A review of harvesting of spare parts from electrical and electronic products," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(3), pages 868-881, June.
    3. Shuai Zhang & Kai Huang & Yufei Yuan, 2021. "Spare Parts Inventory Management: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-23, February.
    4. Shafiee, Mahmood & Chukova, Stefanka, 2013. "Maintenance models in warranty: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(3), pages 561-572.
    5. Hur, Mansik & Keskin, Burcu B. & Schmidt, Charles P., 2018. "End-of-life inventory control of aircraft spare parts under performance based logistics," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 186-203.
    6. van der Heijden, Matthieu & Iskandar, Bermawi P., 2013. "Last time buy decisions for products sold under warranty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 224(2), pages 302-312.
    7. Robotis, Andreas & Boyaci, Tamer & Verter, Vedat, 2012. "Investing in reusability of products of uncertain remanufacturing cost: The role of inspection capabilities," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 385-395.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:hiclch:209282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hicl.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.