IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/zbw/hiclch/209222.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

A Multi-Agent Based Approach for Risk Management in a Port Container Terminal

In: Next Generation Supply Chains: Trends and Opportunities. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), Vol. 18

Author

Listed:
  • Bearzotti, Lorena
  • Gonzalez, Rosa

Abstract

The growth of foreign trade and globalization emphasize the weaknesses of extended supply chain in front of occurrence of disruptive events that impact differently (deviation, disruption, disaster) the normal operation, in some cases the consequences are temporary but the worst scenario is when the event produces a permanent cessation of its activities. Then the ports are a strategic actor because if they have problems with their operations the others in the supply chain will be affected negatively, so the ports resilience determines the level of resilience of multiple supply chain in which they participate. Because of this it is necessary to have tools that provide support to the process of risk management in order to have proactive and reactive, responses to the different disruption events that may occur in its operation. In this paper a multiagent approach to risk management in container terminal is presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Bearzotti, Lorena & Gonzalez, Rosa, 2014. "A Multi-Agent Based Approach for Risk Management in a Port Container Terminal," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Next Generation Supply Chains: Trends and Opportunities. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), Vol. 18, volume 18, pages 515-530, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:hiclch:209222
    DOI: 10.15480/882.1188
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/209222/1/hicl-2014-18-515.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15480/882.1188?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bearzotti, Lorena A. & Salomone, Enrique & Chiotti, Omar J., 2012. "An autonomous multi-agent approach to supply chain event management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 468-478.
    2. Olivier Lavastre & A. Gunasekaran & Alain Spalanzani, 2012. "Supply chain risk management in french companies," Post-Print halshs-00740450, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kersten, Wolfgang & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), 2014. "Next Generation Supply Chains: Trends and Opportunities," Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management, volume 18, number 18.
    2. Laurent Lim, Lâm & Alpan, Gülgün & Penz, Bernard, 2014. "Reconciling sales and operations management with distant suppliers in the automotive industry: A simulation approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 20-36.
    3. Ahmed Hamdi & Tarik Saikouk & Bouchaib Bahli, 2020. "Facing supply chain disruptions: enhancers of supply chain resiliency," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 40(4), pages 2943-2958.
    4. Qazi, Abroon & Dickson, Alex & Quigley, John & Gaudenzi, Barbara, 2018. "Supply chain risk network management: A Bayesian belief network and expected utility based approach for managing supply chain risks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 24-42.
    5. Adhau, Sunil & Mittal, M.L. & Mittal, Abhinav, 2013. "A multi-agent system for decentralized multi-project scheduling with resource transfers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 646-661.
    6. Oana Buliga & Christian W. Scheiner & Kai-Ingo Voigt, 2016. "Business model innovation and organizational resilience: towards an integrated conceptual framework," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 86(6), pages 647-670, August.
    7. Ennouri Wissem, 2013. "Risks Management: New Literature Review," Polish Journal of Management Studies, Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management, vol. 8(1), pages 288-297, December.
    8. Shafiee, Mohammad & Zare-Mehrjerdi, Yahia & Govindan, Kannan & Dastgoshade, Sohaib, 2022. "A causality analysis of risks to perishable product supply chain networks during the COVID-19 outbreak era: An extended DEMATEL method under Pythagorean fuzzy environment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    9. Qingyou Yan & Meijuan Zhang & Wei Li & Guangyu Qin, 2020. "Risk Assessment of New Energy Vehicle Supply Chain Based on Variable Weight Theory and Cloud Model: A Case Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-21, April.
    10. Xu, Liming & Mak, Stephen & Brintrup, Alexandra, 2021. "Will bots take over the supply chain? Revisiting agent-based supply chain automation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    11. Hao, Jun & Li, Jianping & Wu, Dengsheng & Sun, Xiaolei, 2020. "Portfolio optimisation of material purchase considering supply risk – A multi-objective programming model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    12. Anasse Amarouche & Philippe Chapellier & Alain George, 2018. "La gestion des risques dans une chaîne d’approvisionnement [La gestion des risques dans une chaine d'approvisionnement : Le cas de la filière d'approvisionnement en fruits et légumes d'une entrepri," Post-Print hal-02101506, HAL.
    13. Güller, Mustafa & Koc, Emre & Henke, Michael & Noche, Bernd & Hingst, Lennart, 2015. "A Simulation-based Analysis of Supply Chain Resilience," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Innovations and Strategies for Logistics and Supply Chains: Technologies, Business Models and Risk Management. Proceedings of the Hamburg Internationa, volume 20, pages 533-556, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    14. H. Norouzi Nav & M. R. Jahed Motlagh & A. Makui, 2017. "Robust controlling of chaotic behavior in supply chain networks," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(6), pages 711-724, June.
    15. Hamideh Khanzadeh Charkhab & Mohammad Reza Eslami & Hassan Dehghan Dehnavi, 2014. "Linking Risk Management Practices and Strategies to Performance. Case Study: Ceramic and Tiles Industry," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 4(2), pages 413-424, April.
    16. Manupati, V.K. & Schoenherr, Tobias & Ramkumar, M. & Panigrahi, Suraj & Sharma, Yash & Mishra, Prakriti, 2022. "Recovery strategies for a disrupted supply chain network: Leveraging blockchain technology in pre- and post-disruption scenarios," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    17. Akira Nishimura, 2014. "Transforming cost design into environmentally conscious cost design in Japan: likelihood and problems for further development," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 55-75, September.
    18. Mishra, Deepa & Sharma, R.R.K. & Kumar, Sameer & Dubey, Rameshwar, 2016. "Bridging and buffering: Strategies for mitigating supply risk and improving supply chain performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 183-197.
    19. Chih-Yang Tsai, 2017. "The impact of cost structure on supply chain cash flow risk," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(22), pages 6624-6637, November.
    20. Muhammad Junaid & Ye Xue & Muzzammil Wasim Syed & Ji Zu Li & Muhammad Ziaullah, 2019. "A Neutrosophic AHP and TOPSIS Framework for Supply Chain Risk Assessment in Automotive Industry of Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-26, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:hiclch:209222. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hicl.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.