IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/zbw/arlaba/102932.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Soft borders als neues Raumkonzept in der EU? Das Beispiel der Makroregionalen Kooperationen

In: Nimm's sportlich - Planung als Hindernislauf

Author

Listed:
  • Sielker, Franziska

Abstract

Mit den neuen, an funktionalen Verflechtungen orientierten Makroregionen sind neue politische Räume entstanden, die sich in vielfacher Hinsicht auf das Territorium, die Territorialität und die Entwicklung der europäischen Integration auswirken. Makroregionen, die durch nationalstaatliche Vertreter parallel zu existierenden Grenzen gebildet werden, stellen eine neue Form der Kooperation dar. Das Neue ist, dass sie ein Trend innerhalb des europäischen Integrationsprozesses sind, der die Frage nach dem Entstehen einer neuen Ebene in der EU aufkommen lässt. In diesem Beitrag wird die Frage nach der Funktion innereuropäischer Grenzen in makroregionalen Kooperationen gestellt. In einem multiperspektivischen Erklärungsansatz werden die durch den makroregionalen Trend denkbaren Entwicklungen für "Grenzen" in Europa aufgezeigt. Vier Entwicklungspfade werden diskutiert: Makroregionen könnten sich erstens als eigene supranationale Ebene mit Entscheidungsbefugnis etablieren und neue Grenzen bilden oder zweitens eine Übergangsform darstellen, die langfristig zu einer weiteren EU-Integration und Stärkung der EU-Ebene führen würde und damit zur Auflösung der Binnengrenzen. Eine dritte Möglichkeit wäre, dass sich Makroregionen als intergouvernemental organisierte Ebene verstetigen. In diesem Fall würden die aktuellen Binnengrenzen erhalten bleiben. Ein vierter Entwicklungspfad würde zu soft borders führen. Makroregionen wären dann parallel zu bestehenden Grenzen liegende Kooperationen mit flexiblen Grenzen.

Suggested Citation

  • Sielker, Franziska, 2014. "Soft borders als neues Raumkonzept in der EU? Das Beispiel der Makroregionalen Kooperationen," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Grotheer, Swantje & Schwöbel, Arne & Stepper, Martina (ed.), Nimm's sportlich - Planung als Hindernislauf, volume 10, pages 79-94, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:arlaba:102932
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/102932/1/ab_010_08.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bob Jessop, 2000. "The Crisis of the National Spatio‐Temporal Fix and the Tendential Ecological Dominance of Globalizing Capitalism," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(2), pages 323-360, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Teufel, Nicolai & Maier, Jörg & Doevenspeck, Martin, 2022. "Cross-border cooperation areas in north Bavaria and west Bohemia: Analysis and evaluation," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Chilla, Tobias & Sielker, Franziska (ed.), Cross-border spatial development in Bavaria: Dynamics in cooperation - Potentials of integration, volume 34, pages 88-107, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    2. Teufel, Nicolai & Maier, Jörg & Doevenspeck, Martin & Dokoupil, Jaroslav, 2018. "Grenzüberschreitende Kooperationsräume in Nordbayern und Westböhmen: Erfassung und Bewertung," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Chilla, Tobias & Sielker, Franziska (ed.), Grenzüberschreitende Raumentwicklung Bayerns: Dynamik in der Kooperation - Potenziale der Verflechtung, volume 23, pages 90-110, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    3. Karola Schober & Richard Balling & Tobias Chilla & Hannah Lindermayer, 2023. "European Integration Processes in the EU GI System—A Long-Term Review of EU Regulation for GIs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-24, February.
    4. Chilla, Tobias & Fráně, Luděk & Sielker, Franziska & Weber, Jürgen, 2022. "Cross-border regional development on the Bavarian-Czech border: The "right" forms of cooperation," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Chilla, Tobias & Sielker, Franziska (ed.), Cross-border spatial development in Bavaria: Dynamics in cooperation - Potentials of integration, volume 34, pages 71-87, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    5. Chilla, Tobias & Fráně, Luděk & Sielker, Franziska & Weber, Jürgen, 2018. "Grenzüberschreitende Regionalentwicklung an der bayerisch-tschechischen Grenze: Die Suche nach den "richtigen" Kooperationsformen," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Chilla, Tobias & Sielker, Franziska (ed.), Grenzüberschreitende Raumentwicklung Bayerns: Dynamik in der Kooperation - Potenziale der Verflechtung, volume 23, pages 72-89, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    6. Peyrony, Jean & Sielker, Franziska & Perrin, Thomas, 2022. "Cross-border territorial cooperation between France and Germany: Evolution, convergence and perspectives," Forschungsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Gustedt, Evelyn & Grabski-Kieron, Ulrike & Demazière, Christophe & Paris, Didier (ed.), Cities and metropolises in France and Germany, volume 20, pages 180-199, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christian Lamour, 2022. "A RADICAL‐RIGHT POPULIST DEFINITION OF CROSS‐NATIONAL REGIONALISM IN EUROPE: Shaping Power Geometries at the Regional Scale Beyond State Borders," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 8-25, January.
    2. David Clelland, 2020. "Beyond the city region? Uneven governance and the evolution of regional economic development in Scotland," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 35(1), pages 7-26, February.
    3. lain Deas & Alex Lord, 2006. "From a New Regionalism to an Unusual Regionalism? The Emergence of Non-standard Regional Spaces and Lessons for the Territorial Reorganisation of the State," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(10), pages 1847-1877, September.
    4. Enrico Gualini & Carola Fricke, 2019. "‘Who governs’ Berlin’s metropolitan region? The strategic-relational construction of metropolitan scale in Berlin–Brandenburg’s economic development policies," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(1), pages 59-80, February.
    5. Benito Giordano & Elisa Roller, 2003. "A Comparison of City Region Dynamics in the UK, Spain and Italy: More Similarities than Differences?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(9), pages 911-927.
    6. Duncan Adam & Anne E Green, 2016. "Soft spaces and soft outcomes: Experiences from City Strategy on local partnership working and measures of success," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(8), pages 1514-1531, August.
    7. Justine Lindemann, 2019. "Gardens and Green Spaces: placemaking and Black entrepreneurialism in Cleveland, Ohio," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 36(4), pages 867-878, December.
    8. Joe Crawford & Kim Mckee & Sharon Leahy, 2020. "The Right to Rent: Active Resistance to Evolving Geographies of State Regulation," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(3), pages 415-428, May.
    9. Jinn-Yuh Hsu & Lu-Lin Cheng, 2002. "Revisiting Economic Development in Post-war Taiwan: The Dynamic Process of Geographical Industrialization," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(8), pages 897-908.
    10. Graham Haughton & Rachel Naylor, 2008. "Reflexive Local and Regional Economic Development and International Policy Transfer," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 23(2), pages 167-178, May.
    11. Callum Ward, 2021. "Contradictions of Financial Capital Switching: Reading the Corporate Leverage Crisis through The Port of Liverpool's Whole Business Securitization," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(2), pages 249-265, March.
    12. Lukas Figge & Kay Oebels & Astrid Offermans, 2017. "The effects of globalization on Ecological Footprints: an empirical analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 863-876, June.
    13. Villanueva Cortés, Paloma, 2015. "The external impact of the Green Economy: An analysis of the environmental implications of the Green Economy," IPE Working Papers 56/2015, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE).
    14. Louis Albrechts & Angela Barbanente & Valeria Monno, 2019. "From stage-managed planning towards a more imaginative and inclusive strategic spatial planning," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(8), pages 1489-1506, December.
    15. Joe Doak & Nikos Karadimitriou, 2007. "(Re)development, Complexity and Networks: A Framework for Research," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(2), pages 209-229, February.
    16. Samman, Amin, 2011. "History in finance and fiction in history: The crisis of 2008 and the return of the past," economic sociology. perspectives and conversations, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, vol. 12(3), pages 26-34.
    17. Alpar Lošonc, 2006. "Is There an Opportunity to Establish the Social-Capitalism in the Post Socialist Transition?," Panoeconomicus, Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Novi Sad, Serbia, vol. 53(4), pages 407-425, December.
    18. Matthew Gandy, 2005. "Cyborg Urbanization: Complexity and Monstrosity in the Contemporary City," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 26-49, March.
    19. Marc Martí-Costa & Mariona Tomà s, 2017. "Urban governance in Spain: From democratic transition to austerity policies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(9), pages 2107-2122, July.
    20. James R. Faulconbridge, 2007. "London's and New York's Advertising and Law Clusters and their Networks of Learning: Relational Analyses with a Politics of Scale?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(9), pages 1635-1656, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:arlaba:102932. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/arlhade.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.