IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-030-76666-5_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Focal Points in Experimental Bargaining Games

In: Bargaining

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Isoni

    (University of Warwick)

  • Robert Sugden

    (University of East Anglia)

  • Jiwei Zheng

    (Lancaster University)

Abstract

The experimental literature on bargaining games is vast and growing. The common thread is the investigation of games in which bargainers reach an agreement that results in some allocation of resources between them. Unlike real-world bargaining, in which negotiations are often multi-dimensional and therefore rather complex, in most experiments outcomes are defined in terms of monetary payoffs to the bargainers, providing participants with real incentives to pursue their interests in a way that is intelligible to researchers. Beyond the major and subtle differences between specific bargaining protocols, most experimental bargaining games have in common the most distinctive feature of bargaining: the multiplicity of alternative agreements (including the possibility of disagreement). The bargainers typically have conflicting preferences over alternative agreements, but a common interest in avoiding costly disagreement. This multiplicity of conflicting alternatives will be the focus of this chapter.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Isoni & Robert Sugden & Jiwei Zheng, 2022. "Focal Points in Experimental Bargaining Games," Springer Books, in: Emin Karagözoğlu & Kyle B. Hyndman (ed.), Bargaining, chapter 0, pages 109-130, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-76666-5_6
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-76666-5_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Valentin Goranko, 2022. "Preplay Negotiations with Unconditional Offers of Side Payments in Two-Player Strategic-Form Games: Towards Non-Cooperative Cooperation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(14), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Rojo Arjona, David & Sitzia, Stefania & Zheng, Jiwei, 2022. "Overcoming coordination failure in games with focal points: An experimental investigation," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 505-523.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-76666-5_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.