IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/oprchp/978-3-319-07001-8_16.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Risk-Adjusted On-line Portfolio Selection

In: Operations Research Proceedings 2013

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Dochow

    (Saarland University)

  • Esther Mohr

    (University of Mannheim)

  • Günter Schmidt

    (University of Cape Town)

Abstract

The objective of on-line portfolio selection is to design provably good algorithms with respect to some on-line or offline benchmark. Existing algorithms do not consider ‘trading risk’. We present a novel risk-adjusted portfolio selection algorithm (RAPS). RAPS incorporates the ‘trading risk’ in terms of the maximum possible loss. We show that RAPS performs provably ‘as well as’ the Universal Portfolio (UP) [4] in the worst-case. We empirically evaluate RAPS on historical NYSE data. Results show that RAPS is able to beat BCRP as well as several ‘follow-the-winner’ algorithms from the literature, including UP. We conclude that RAPS outperforms in case the assets in the portfolio follow a positive trend.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Dochow & Esther Mohr & Günter Schmidt, 2014. "Risk-Adjusted On-line Portfolio Selection," Operations Research Proceedings, in: Dennis Huisman & Ilse Louwerse & Albert P.M. Wagelmans (ed.), Operations Research Proceedings 2013, edition 127, pages 113-119, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:oprchp:978-3-319-07001-8_16
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-07001-8_16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Esther Mohr & Robert Dochow, 2017. "Risk management strategies for finding universal portfolios," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 256(1), pages 129-147, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:oprchp:978-3-319-07001-8_16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.