IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/oprchp/978-3-319-00795-3_83.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Two-Stage Versus Single-Stage Inventory Models with or without Repair Ability

In: Operations Research Proceedings 2012

Author

Listed:
  • Ismail Serdar Bakal

    (Middle East Technical University)

  • Serkan Ozpamukcu

    (Middle East Technical University)

  • Pelin Bayindir

    (Middle East Technical University)

Abstract

In this study, we consider an inventory system for a single item, which is being used in the military operations. In the current system, there is a two-echelon inventory setting which consists of a single stock point, the central depot, in the upper echelon and several stock points, the bases, in the lower echelon. A continuous review base-stock policy is used by all facilities. The military headquarters responsible for inventory management identified improvement opportunities such as acquiring repair ability and changing the structure of the supply chain from a two-echelon model to a single echelon model. Considering these opportunities, we investigate four different alternative inventory systems, single-echelon and two echelon models with or without repair ability. Our objective is to determine if and under what conditions each alternative results in lower costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Ismail Serdar Bakal & Serkan Ozpamukcu & Pelin Bayindir, 2014. "Two-Stage Versus Single-Stage Inventory Models with or without Repair Ability," Operations Research Proceedings, in: Stefan Helber & Michael Breitner & Daniel Rösch & Cornelia Schön & Johann-Matthias Graf von der Schu (ed.), Operations Research Proceedings 2012, edition 127, pages 555-560, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:oprchp:978-3-319-00795-3_83
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-00795-3_83
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amin Yazdekhasti & Yahia Zare Mehrjardi, 2020. "Two-echelon three-indenture warranty distribution network: a hybrid branch and bound, Monte-Carlo approach," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 1113-1158, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:oprchp:978-3-319-00795-3_83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.