IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/lum/prchap/05-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Youth Entrepreneurship and Role Models at Local Level. Case Study: Bihor County, Romania

In: 10th LUMEN International Scientific Conference Rethinking Social Action. Core Values in Practice | RSACVP 2018 | 20-21 April 2018 | Suceava – Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Anca Otilia Dodescu

    (Prof. PhD, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania)

  • Ioana Crina Pop CohuÅ£

    (Senior lecturer, PhD, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Oradea, Romania)

Abstract

In the context of promoting inclusive entrepreneurship in Romania, the present paper addresses the issue of youth as a disadvantaged group on the labour market and under-represented in entrepreneurship from a local perspective and highlights the role models as a key instrument for encouraging youth entrepreneurship. Thus, in addition to a brief theoretical background about youth entrepreneurship and policies to stimulate business creation among young people in the European Union (EU) and Romania, we analysed the statistics on the labour market and youth business creation in Bihor County, Romania and conducted a qualitative research based on an in-depth interview applied to 12 young entrepreneurs from Bihor County, Romania. The research findings outline a local perspective about the motivations, opportunities, obstacles and difficulties of youth entrepreneurship in an EU lagging region, the access to finance, the role of education, family, support networks and the influence of models from local business environment for young entrepreneurs, their business identity in the local business environment, and how entrepreneurship changes young people's perception of business creation and self-employment. The main conclusion of the paper is that, despite the Romanian legislation and policies that are not friendly enough to youth entrepreneurship as well as local business environment, and despite erroneous perceptions of young people about financing a business, there are young models who had the courage to change their lives for good, who succeed and recommend to other young people to become business owners or self-employed. Alongside facilitating access to finance, role-models are, in our opinion, the most important tool for promoting youth entrepreneurship at local level.

Suggested Citation

  • Anca Otilia Dodescu & Ioana Crina Pop CohuÅ£, 2018. "Youth Entrepreneurship and Role Models at Local Level. Case Study: Bihor County, Romania," Book chapters-LUMEN Proceedings, in: Antonio SANDU & Tomita CIULEI (ed.), 10th LUMEN International Scientific Conference Rethinking Social Action. Core Values in Practice | RSACVP 2018 | 20-21 April 2018 | Suceava – Romani, edition 1, volume 5, chapter 12, pages 117-134, Editura Lumen.
  • Handle: RePEc:lum:prchap:05-12
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/lumproc.41
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://proceedings.lumenpublishing.com/ojs/index.php/lumenproceedings/article/view/44/44
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://proceedings.lumenpublishing.com/ojs/index.php/lumenproceedings/article/view/44
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.18662/lumproc.41?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zoltán J. à cs (ed.), 2010. "Entrepreneurship and Regional Development," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13846.
    2. Ioana Crina Pop Cohut & Lavinia Florentina Chirila, 2017. "Boosting Inclusive Entrepreneurship As A Strategic Option Of Local Development In Romania In 2014-2020 (Ii)," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 107-117, December.
    3. ASCE Editors, 2012. "2012 Conference Program," Annual Proceedings, The Association for the Study of the Cuban Economy, vol. 22.
    4. Dodescu Anca & Pop-Cohut Ioana, 2015. "Inclusive Entrepreneurship In Romania In The Context Of European Union: Policy Analysis For 2007-2013," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 207-215, December.
    5. Anders Lundström & Lois A. Stevenson, 2005. "Entrepreneurship Policy: Theory and Practice," International Studies in Entrepreneurship, Springer, number 978-0-387-24202-6, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anca Otilia Dodescu & Elena Aurelia Botezat & Ioana Crina Pop Cohut & Afrodita Borma, 2019. "Antecedents, Experiences and Entrepreneurial Intentions among Economics Students," Book chapters-LUMEN Proceedings, in: Camelia Ignatescu (ed.), 12th LUMEN International Scientific Conference Rethinking Social Action. Core Values in Practice | RSACVP 2019 | 15-17 May 2019 | Iasi – Romania, edition 1, volume 9, chapter 10, pages 89-107, Editura Lumen.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. László Szerb & Éva Komlósi & Zoltán J. Ács & Raquel Ortega-Argilés, 2013. "Measuring Regional Entrepreneurship in Hungary," Proceedings- 11th International Conference on Mangement, Enterprise and Benchmarking (MEB 2013),, Óbuda University, Keleti Faculty of Business and Management.
    2. Holger Patzelt & Dean A. Shepherd, 2009. "Strategic Entrepreneurship at Universities: Academic Entrepreneurs’ Assessment of Policy Programs," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 33(1), pages 319-340, January.
    3. Jeffrey A. Robinson & Richard N. Hayes, 2012. "Opportunity Recognition In Inner-City Markets: An Exploratory Study," Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship (JDE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(02), pages 1-25.
    4. Edwin Tarapuez Chamorro & Hugo Osorio Ceballos & Juan José Botero Villa, 2013. "Política de emprendimiento en Colombia, 2002-2010," Estudios Gerenciales, Universidad Icesi, September.
    5. Raquel Ortega-Argilés, 2022. "The evolution of regional entrepreneurship policies: “no one size fits all”," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 69(3), pages 585-610, December.
    6. Michael Fritsch & Pamela Mueller, 2007. "The persistence of regional new business formation-activity over time – assessing the potential of policy promotion programs," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 299-315, June.
    7. Claire Economidou & Luca Grilli & Magnus Henrekson & Mark Sanders, 2018. "Financial and Institutional Reforms for an Entrepreneurial Society," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 279-291, August.
    8. Dragos Dianu & Monica (Cenan) Ciucos & Alina Badulescu & Daniel Badulescu, 2021. "Public Policies To Support Entrepreneurship: Do They Contribute To Strengthen Smes Sector?," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 39-48, July.
    9. Marco Savastano & Altaf Hussain Samo & Nisar Ahmed Channa & Carlo Amendola, 2022. "Toward a Conceptual Framework to Foster Green Entrepreneurship Growth in the Agriculture Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, March.
    10. Elert, Niklas & Henrekson, Magnus & Stenkula, Mikael, 2017. "Institutional Reform for Innovation and Entrepreneurship: An Agenda for Europe," Working Paper Series 1150, Research Institute of Industrial Economics, revised 16 Feb 2017.
    11. Hong Joo Lee, 2019. "What Factors Are Necessary for Sustaining Entrepreneurship?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-20, May.
    12. Anca-Otilia Dodescu & Elena-Aurelia Botezat & Alexandru Constăngioară & Ioana-Crina Pop-Cohuţ, 2021. "A Partial Least-Square Mediation Analysis of the Contribution of Cross-Campus Entrepreneurship Education to Students’ Entrepreneurial Intentions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-26, August.
    13. Walid A. Nakara & Karim Messeghem & Andry Ramaroson, 2021. "Innovation and entrepreneurship in a context of poverty: a multilevel approach," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1601-1617, April.
    14. Rotger, Gabriel Pons & Gørtz, Mette & Storey, David J., 2012. "Assessing the effectiveness of guided preparation for new venture creation and performance: Theory and practice," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 506-521.
    15. Pradhan, Jaya Prakash & Husain, Tareef, 2021. "Drivers of SME Formation in Indian States: The Empirics," MPRA Paper 25061, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Michael Sheriff & Moreno Muffatto, 2014. "Reviewing Existing Policies For Unleashing And Fostering Entrepreneurship In Selected African Countries," Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship (JDE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(03), pages 1-36.
    17. Boris Urban & Zethu Dlamini, 2020. "Intersections between policy and institutions: a focus on enterprise growth in Swaziland," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 9(3), pages 253-275, April.
    18. Per-Anders Havnes & Line Marie B Skjekkeland, 2007. "Evaluating Entrepreneurship Programmes – Objectives And Measurement Dilemmas," Journal of Enterprising Culture (JEC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(04), pages 339-370.
    19. Michael Wyrwich & Michael Stuetzer & Rolf Sternberg, 2016. "Entrepreneurial role models, fear of failure, and institutional approval of entrepreneurship: a tale of two regions," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 467-492, March.
    20. Amparo Serrano‐Pascual & Carlota Carretero‐García, 2022. "Women’s entrepreneurial subjectivity under scrutiny: Expert knowledge on gender and entrepreneurship," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 666-686, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    youth entrepreneurship; role models; access to finance; Bihor County; Romania;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A3 - General Economics and Teaching - - Multisubject Collective Works
    • I2 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education
    • I3 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty
    • M0 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:prchap:05-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://proceedings.lumenpublishing.com/ojs/index.php/lumenproceedings .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.