IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/lum/prchap/01-83.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Romanian Constitutional Court Decision of Relevance in the Field of Medical Law

In: Rethinking Social Action. Core Values in Practice

Author

Listed:
  • Elena TOADER

    (Assoc. Prof. PhD., “Gr. T. Popa†University of Medicine and Pharmacy, School of Medicine, Department of Bioethics and Medical Ethics, Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Iasi, Romania)

  • Cristina TEODORA POP

    (PhD. Candidate, “Alexandru Ioan Cuza†University in Iaşi, Romania)

Abstract

Constitutionality review is of high significance in the area of medical law in terms of the effects that the decisions of the Constitutional Court, which have a final and generally binding nature, generate in this branch of law. The resultant of the previously reference legal effects is the constitutionalisation phenomenon of medical law, which consists of a process of interaction between constitutional and medical law rules, whose finality is both the reconciling of legal provisions governing the medical field with the provisions of the Basic Law, and the elevation of some of these rules at constitutional level. Among the decisions of the Constitutional Courts that are relevant for medical law is Decision no. 717 of 29 October 2015, whereby the impossibility to exclude medical doctors from the sphere of civil servants governed by the Criminal Code and Decision no. 184 of 29 March 2016. Related to the above mentioned decisions, is important to be mentioned that the decisions of the Constitutional Court of Romania regarding the erga omenes mandatory decisions of the Highest Court of Cassation and Justice of Romania have mandatory effect. Thus these decisions should be respected and applied by all the ordinary courts and by the Highest Court of Cassation and Justice, as well.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena TOADER & Cristina TEODORA POP, 2017. "Romanian Constitutional Court Decision of Relevance in the Field of Medical Law," Book chapters-LUMEN Proceedings, in: Camelia IGNATESCU & Antonio SANDU & Tomita CIULEI (ed.), Rethinking Social Action. Core Values in Practice, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 83, pages 911-918, Editura Lumen.
  • Handle: RePEc:lum:prchap:01-83
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/lumproc.rsacvp2017.83
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://proceedings.lumenpublishing.com/ojs/index.php/lumenproceedings/article/view/488/492
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://proceedings.lumenpublishing.com/ojs/index.php/lumenproceedings/article/view/488
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.18662/lumproc.rsacvp2017.83?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Medical doctors; civil servants; passive bribery; High Court of Cassation and Justice; Constitutional Court decisions; constitutionalisation of medical law;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A3 - General Economics and Teaching - - Multisubject Collective Works
    • I2 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education
    • I3 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty
    • M0 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:prchap:01-83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://proceedings.lumenpublishing.com/ojs/index.php/lumenproceedings .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.