IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/zbw/usgivw/62.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

The Current InsurTech Landscape: Business Models and Disruptive Potential

Author

Listed:
  • Braun, Alexander
  • Schreiber, Florian

Abstract

We take a detailed look at the current InsurTech landscape from the angle of the academic management literature. Our main goals are to establish a common understanding of key concepts, to facilitate the navigation of this rapidly evolving sector, and to provide an intuitive toolkit for an assessment of the entrants' disruptive potential as well as the selection of adequate response strategies by incumbents. Based on a threedimensional taxonomy, we screen the existing InsurTech startup range. Two aspects stand out in this regard. First, although the vast majority of activities still focuses on the distribution part of the industry ecosystem, full-stack InsurTech risk carriers are starting to become more commonplace. Second, we hardly observe any real game-changing business model innovations yet, as many existing startups are essentially pepping up classical industry approaches with the patterns "e-commerce" or "digitization". Consistent with this observation, most entrants are not on a disruptive trajectory. Instead, they can be assigned to the category "enablers", suggesting "cooperation" as the incumbents' reaction of choice for the majority of currently prevailing scenarios. These findings are confirmed by a comprehensive survey among startups and incumbents. Several directions for the future evolution of the sector are plausible. We identify a number of powerful business model recombinations that are either already launching or clearly visible on the horizon. The largest threats are likely to arise from out-of-the box approaches. One example are digital insurers that add significant value for the customer through personalized coverage based on a comprehensive individual risk assessment. Similarly, genuine peer-to-peer concepts, which enable risk transfer directly to the capital markets, could call the primordial relevance of insurance companies into question and therefore lead to outright disintermediation. Consequently, the still relatively comfortable situation for incumbents that currently prevails may not last for long.

Suggested Citation

  • Braun, Alexander & Schreiber, Florian, 2017. "The Current InsurTech Landscape: Business Models and Disruptive Potential," I.VW HSG Schriftenreihe, University of St.Gallen, Institute of Insurance Economics (I.VW-HSG), volume 62, number 62.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:usgivw:62
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/226646/1/I-VW-HSG-Schriftenreihe-62.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Iván Sosa Gómez & Óscar Montes Pineda, 2023. "What is an InsurTech? A scientific approach for defining the term," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 26(2), pages 125-173, July.
    2. Thomas Puschmann & Christian Hugo Hoffmann & Valentyn Khmarskyi, 2020. "How Green FinTech Can Alleviate the Impact of Climate Change—The Case of Switzerland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-30, December.
    3. Martin Eling & Davide Nuessle & Julian Staubli, 2022. "The impact of artificial intelligence along the insurance value chain and on the insurability of risks," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 47(2), pages 205-241, April.
    4. Pierpaolo Marano, 2021. "Management of Distribution Risks and Digital Transformation of Insurance Distribution—A Regulatory Gap in the IDD," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-11, August.
    5. Angela Zeier Röschmann & Matthias Erny & Joël Wagner, 2022. "On the (future) role of on-demand insurance: market landscape, business model and customer perception," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 47(3), pages 603-642, July.
    6. Ma, Yu Luen & Ren, Yayuan, 2023. "InsurTech—Promise, threat or hype? Insights from stock market reaction to InsurTech innovation," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    7. Iván Sosa & Óscar Montes, 2022. "Understanding the InsurTech dynamics in the transformation of the insurance sector," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 25(1), pages 35-68, April.
    8. Jie Liu & Shujun Ye & Yujin Zhang & Lulu Zhang, 2023. "Research on InsurTech and the Technology Innovation Level of Insurance Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, May.
    9. Cao, Siqing & Lyu, Hanjia & Xu, Xian, 2020. "InsurTech development: Evidence from Chinese media reports," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    10. Xian Xu & Peter Zweifel, 2020. "A framework for the evaluation of InsurTech," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 23(4), pages 305-329, December.
    11. Martin Eling & Martin Lehmann, 2018. "The Impact of Digitalization on the Insurance Value Chain and the Insurability of Risks," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 43(3), pages 359-396, July.
    12. Petzold, Neele & Schmidt, Alexander Lennart & Scaringella, Laurent, 2023. "How to overcome the disruptor's dilemma: Exploring strategic alliance reconfiguration of new market entrants," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    13. Marta Ostrowska, 2021. "Regulation of InsurTech: Is the Principle of Proportionality an Answer?," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-12, October.
    14. Gian Paolo Clemente & Pierpaolo Marano, 2020. "The broker model for peer-to-peer insurance: an analysis of its value," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 45(3), pages 457-481, July.
    15. Antonella Cappiello, 2020. "The Digital (R)evolution of Insurance Business Models," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Science Publications, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, January.
    16. Beer, Simone & Braun, Alexander & Bühler, Pascal & Eling, Martin & Maas, Peter & Reichel, Lukas & Rüfenacht, Matthias & Schaper, Philipp & Schmeiser, Hato & Schreiber, Florian & Steiner, Philipp Hendr, 2017. "Assekuranz 2025: Quo vadis?," I.VW HSG Schriftenreihe, University of St.Gallen, Institute of Insurance Economics (I.VW-HSG), volume 63, number 63.
    17. Michele Loi & Christian Hauser & Markus Christen, 2022. "Highway to (Digital) Surveillance: When Are Clients Coerced to Share Their Data with Insurers?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 7-19, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:usgivw:62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ivwsgch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.