IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/zbw/hbsedi/234.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Evaluation der Qualität der Promotionskollegs der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung: Eine quantitative und qualitative Studie

Author

Listed:
  • Böttcher, Wolfgang
  • Krüger, Heinz-Hermann

Abstract

In diesem Bericht werden die Ergebnisse eines Projektes referiert, das aus einer qualitativen und einer quantitativen Teilstudie besteht. Ziel des Projektes war es, unterschiedliche Aspekte der Qualität der von der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung im vergangenen Jahrzehnt an verschiedenen deutschen Universitäten eingerichteten Promotionskollegs zu untersuchen. Die gemeinsame Entwicklung der Forschungsinstrumente, regelmäßiger Austausch zwischen den qualitativ und quantitativ forschenden Evaluationsteams und schließlich der Versuch, anhand ausgewählter qualitativ generierter Thesen statistische Zusammenhangsanalysen zu erstellen, zeigt, dass es sich bei dieser Evaluationsstudie nicht um eine schlichte Addition zweier unterschiedlicher Forschungslogiken handelt.Auf Grundlage der Befunde werden Empfehlungen für die weitere Gestaltung der HBS-Kollegs formuliert, die nicht nur für deren Qualitätsentwicklung nützlich sein dürften. Die datengestützten Vorschläge können auch Grundlage für Diskussion über die zukünftige Weiterentwicklung des Kolleg-Modells sein.

Suggested Citation

  • Böttcher, Wolfgang & Krüger, Heinz-Hermann, 2009. "Evaluation der Qualität der Promotionskollegs der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung: Eine quantitative und qualitative Studie," Study / edition der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf, volume 127, number 234.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:hbsedi:234
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/116455/1/edition_hbs_234.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ann E. Austin, 2002. "Preparing the Next Generation of Faculty," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 73(1), pages 94-122, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Catherine E. Déri & Émilie Tremblay-Wragg & Sara Mathieu-C., 2022. "Academic Writing Groups in Higher Education: History and State of Play," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(1), pages 1-85, February.
    2. Hottenrott, Hanna & Lawson, Cornelia, 2014. "Flying the nest: How the home department shapes researchers’ career paths," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis LEI & BRICK - Laboratory of Economics of Innovation "Franco Momigliano", Bureau of Research in Innovation, Complexity and Knowledge, Collegio 201409, University of Turin.
    3. Ghaleb Alnahdi & Dimitris Anastasiou, 2020. "Recruitment Practices for Special Education Faculty: Implications for Saudi Universities," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(3), pages 21582440209, August.
    4. Bäker, Agnes, 2015. "Non-tenured post-doctoral researchers’ job mobility and research output: An analysis of the role of research discipline, department size, and coauthors," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 634-650.
    5. Shibayama, Sotaro, 2019. "Sustainable development of science and scientists: Academic training in life science labs," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 676-692.
    6. Sofia Patsali & Michele Pezzoni & Fabiana Visentin, 2021. "The Impact of Research Independence on PhD Students’ Careers: Large-Scale Evidence from France," Post-Print hal-03564708, HAL.
    7. Joyce B. Main & Yanbing Wang & Li Tan, 2022. "Preparing Industry Leaders: The Role of Doctoral Education and Early Career Management Training in the Leadership Trajectories of Women STEM PhDs," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 63(3), pages 400-424, May.
    8. Niels Stijn & Frank J. Rijnsoever & Martine Veelen, 2018. "Exploring the motives and practices of university–start-up interaction: evidence from Route 128," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 674-713, June.
    9. Henry Sauermann & Michael Roach, 2011. "Not All Scientists pay to be Scientists:," DRUID Working Papers 11-03, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    10. Jonas Lindahl & Cristian Colliander & Rickard Danell, 2020. "Early career performance and its correlation with gender and publication output during doctoral education," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(1), pages 309-330, January.
    11. Diana Denham & Mary Ann Rozance & Melanie Malone & Erin Goodling, 2021. "Sustaining future environmental educators: building critical interdisciplinary teaching capacity among graduate students," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 11(1), pages 101-114, March.
    12. Ana Sofia Morais & Wasilios Hariskos, 2018. "Academic coaching and decision analysis: Ways of deciding whether to pursue an academic career," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, November.
    13. Soojeong Jeong & Kaylee Litson & Jennifer Blaney & David F. Feldon, 2020. "Shifting Gears: Characteristics and Consequences of Latent Class Transitions in Doctoral Socialization," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 61(8), pages 1027-1053, December.
    14. Charles Eesley & Jian Bai Li & Delin Yang, 2016. "Does Institutional Change in Universities Influence High-Tech Entrepreneurship? Evidence from China’s Project 985," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 446-461, April.
    15. Beronda L. Montgomery & Jualynne E. Dodson & Sonya M. Johnson, 2014. "Guiding the Way," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(4), pages 21582440145, November.
    16. Gerardo Reyes-Ruiz & Alejandro Barragán-Ocaña & Samuel Olmos-Peña & María Eugenia González-à vila, 2018. "Perceptions of High School Students on Academic Training for Science and Technology in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area," SAGE Open, , vol. 8(4), pages 21582440188, October.
    17. Penelope Muzanenhamo & Rashedur Chowdhury, 2022. "Leveraging from Racism: A Dual Structural Advantages Perspective," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 36(1), pages 167-178, February.
    18. Živan Živković & Marija Panić, 2020. "Development of science and education in the Western Balkan countries: competitiveness with the EU," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(3), pages 2319-2339, September.
    19. Cayce C. Hughes & Kristen Schilt & Bridget K. Gorman & Jenifer L. Bratter, 2017. "Framing the Faculty Gender Gap: A View from STEM Doctoral Students," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(4), pages 398-416, July.
    20. Andrea Seidl & Stefan Wrzaczek & Fouad El Ouardighi & Gustav Feichtinger, 2016. "Optimal Career Strategies and Brain Drain in Academia," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 168(1), pages 268-295, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:hbsedi:234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/boeckde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.