IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/zbw/hbsedi/215.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Stand und Perspektiven der Beschäftigung in der Nanotechnologie in Deutschland: Eine Expertise auf Grundlage vorhandener Studien und Expertengespräche

Author

Listed:
  • Pfirrmann, Oliver

Abstract

Für die Studie wurden insgesamt 42 Dokumente ausgewertet. Zu konstatieren sind erhebliche Abweichungen zwischen Aussagen zum Beschäftigungsstand und zu den Beschäftigtenpotenzialen in Deutschland. Diese sind zum einen dadurch zu erklären, dass in der Analyse vorrangig nur die direkten Beschäftigungswirkungen ausgewiesen werden, während andere Studien auch die indirekten Wirkungen berücksichtigen. Zum anderen erklären sich die Abweichungen durch hier gewählte unterschiedliche Vorgehensweisen zur Bestimmung des Beschäftigungspotenzials der Nanotechnologie in Deutschland.Die unterschiedlichen Herangehensweisen ergeben einen aktuellen Beschäftigungskorridor von mindestens 35.000 bis 52.000 Personen, die unmittelbar im Kontext der Nanotechnologie in Deutschland beschäftigt sind.Im Hinblick auf das künftige bzw. erwartete Beschäftigungspotenzial ist mit einem erheblichen Wachstum zu rechnen. Bezogen auf den aktuellen Beschäftigungskorridor von 35.000 bis 52.000 Personen würde das einem Zuwachs von rund 20% (Untergrenze) bis gut 43% (Obergrenze) entsprechen. Mit dieser Steigerung ist das originäre Beschäftigungspotenzial der Nanotechnologie in den industriellen Kernsektoren erfasst.

Suggested Citation

  • Pfirrmann, Oliver, 2008. "Stand und Perspektiven der Beschäftigung in der Nanotechnologie in Deutschland: Eine Expertise auf Grundlage vorhandener Studien und Expertengespräche," Study / edition der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf, volume 127, number 215.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:hbsedi:215
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/116448/1/edition_hbs_215.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beise, Marian, 2004. "Lead markets: country-specific drivers of the global diffusion of innovations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(6-7), pages 997-1018, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vallentin, Daniel, 2007. "Inducing the international diffusion of carbon capture and storage technologies in the power sector," Wuppertal Papers 162, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy.
    2. Beise, Marian & Cleff, Thomas, 2004. "Assessing the lead market potential of countries for innovation projects," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 453-477.
    3. Guiyang Zhang & Chaoying Tang & Yong Qi, 2020. "Alliance Network Diversity and Innovation Ambidexterity: The Differential Roles of Industrial Diversity, Geographical Diversity, and Functional Diversity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, February.
    4. Dendi Ramdani & Arjen Witteloostuijn & Johanna Vanderstraeten & Julie Hermans & Marcus Dejardin, 2019. "The perceived benefits of the European Union standardization. An exploration according to firm size and firm capabilities," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 379-396, April.
    5. Losacker, Sebastian, 2022. "‘License to green’: Regional patent licensing networks and green technology diffusion in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    6. Juliana Subtil Lacerda & Jeroen C. J. M. Van den Bergh, 2014. "International Diffusion of Renewable Energy Innovations: Lessons from the Lead Markets for Wind Power in China, Germany and USA," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-28, December.
    7. Achcaoucaou, Fariza & Miravitlles, Paloma & León-Darder, Fidel, 2014. "Knowledge sharing and subsidiary R&D mandate development: A matter of dual embeddedness," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 76-90.
    8. Christian Rammer & Dirk Czarnitzki & Alfred Spielkamp, 2009. "Innovation success of non-R&D-performers: substituting technology by management in SMEs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 35-58, June.
    9. Torben Schubert & Elisabeth Baier & Christian Rammer, 2018. "Firm capabilities, technological dynamism and the internationalisation of innovation: A behavioural approach," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 49(1), pages 70-95, January.
    10. Elizabeth A. Alexander, 2012. "The Effects of Legal, Normative, and Cultural-Cognitive Institutions on Innovation in Technology Alliances," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 52(6), pages 791-815, December.
    11. Rammer, Christian & Schmiele, Anja, 2008. "Drivers and Effects of Internationalising Innovation by SMEs," ZEW Discussion Papers 08-035 [rev.], ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    12. Felix Groba, 2014. "Determinants of trade with solar energy technology components: evidence on the porter hypothesis?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(5), pages 503-526, February.
    13. Levsen, Nils & Herstatt, Cornelius, 2014. "Lead markets in age-based innovations," Working Papers 80, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management.
    14. Hünermund, Paul & Licht, Georg & Rammer, Christian, 2016. "Evaluierung der nationalen Förderung im Förderprogramm Eurostars 1 (2008-2013)," ZEW Expertises, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, number 155368, September.
    15. Tiwari, Rajnish & Kalogerakis, Katharina, 2016. "A bibliometric analysis of academic papers on frugal innovation," Working Papers 93, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management.
    16. Bernhard Dachs & Björn Budde, 2016. "Fallstudie Nachhaltiges Bauen und Lead Markets in Österreich," EIIW Discussion paper disbei226, Universitätsbibliothek Wuppertal, University Library.
    17. Schubert, Torben & Baier, Elisabeth & Rammer, Christian, 2016. "Technological capabilities, technological dynamism and innovation offshoring," ZEW Discussion Papers 16-044, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    18. Tiwari, Rajnish & Herstatt, Cornelius, 2011. "Role of "Lead Market" factors in globalization of innovation: Emerging evidence from India & its implications," Working Papers 64, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management.
    19. Walz, Rainer & Helfrich, Nicki & Enzmann, Alexander, 2009. "A system dynamics approach for modelling a lead-market-based export potential," Working Papers "Sustainability and Innovation" S3/2009, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    20. Tiwari, Rajnish & Herstatt, Cornelius, 2012. "Open global innovation networks as enablers of frugal innovation: propositions based on evidence from India," Working Papers 72, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:hbsedi:215. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/boeckde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.