IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/wfo/wstudy/38924.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Stringency and Distribution in the EU Emission Trading Scheme: First Evidence. TranSust.Scan Working Paper

Author

Listed:
  • Claudia Kettner
  • Angela Köppl
  • Stefan Schleicher

    (WIFO)

Abstract

Based on the verified emissions for the 2005 and 2006 trading years, the actual emissions and allowances for each installation covered by the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) were compared. Based on data available for 24 EU countries as of May 2007, this paper uses a thorough data analysis for about 9,900 installations to investigate evidence on three issues: first, the stringency of the total allocation cap and allocation differences both among the member countries and a selection of emission intensive sectors; second, the distribution of the size of installations; and third, the spread of allocation discrepancies and possible allocation biases regarding the size of installations. There is a surprisingly high spread of allocation discrepancies, which provide evidence for treating small installations differently from large ones: the inequality of distribution of the size of installations, between allocated and verified allowances, variations in the spread of the allocation discrepancies both by country and by sector reflecting the implementation of National Allocation Plans, the size of an installation and its allocation discrepancy.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudia Kettner & Angela Köppl & Stefan Schleicher, 2008. "Stringency and Distribution in the EU Emission Trading Scheme: First Evidence. TranSust.Scan Working Paper," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 38924, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:wfo:wstudy:38924
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.wifo.ac.at/wwa/pubid/38924
    File Function: abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael Nippa & Sanjay Patnaik & Markus Taussig, 2021. "MNE responses to carbon pricing regulations: Theory and evidence," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(5), pages 904-929, July.
    2. Rodríguez, Miguel & Robaina, Margarita & Teotónio, Carla, 2019. "Sectoral effects of a Green Tax Reform in Portugal," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 408-418.
    3. Manoj Anand & Jagandeep Singh, 2018. "Impact of Automobile Regulations on Shareholders’ Wealth: Indian Empirical Evidence," Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research, , vol. 17(1), pages 28-40, June.
    4. Angela Köppl & Gregor Thenius & Stefan Schleicher, 2008. "Impacts of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme: Insights from the First Trading Period with a Focus on Competitiveness Issues," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 33963, February.
    5. Claudia Kettner & Daniela Kletzan-Slamanig & Angela Köppl, 2015. "The EU Emission Trading Scheme: sectoral allocation and factors determining emission changes," Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1-14, March.
    6. Quan Guo & Jun Hong & Jing Rong & Haiyan Ma & Mengnan Lv & Mengyang Wu, 2022. "Impact of Environmental Regulations on High-Quality Development of Energy: From the Perspective of Provincial Differences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-16, September.
    7. Wang, Yizhong & Hang, Ye & Wang, Qunwei, 2022. "Joint or separate? An economic-environmental comparison of energy-consuming and carbon emissions permits trading in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    8. Claudia Kettner & Daniela Kletzan-Slamanig, 2022. "Allowance Transactions in the EU ETS – Evidence from Austrian Companies," WIFO Working Papers 641, WIFO.
    9. Yue‐Jun Zhang & Wei Shi & Lin Jiang, 2020. "Does China's carbon emissions trading policy improve the technology innovation of relevant enterprises?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 872-885, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wfo:wstudy:38924. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Florian Mayr (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wifooat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.