IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/cup/cbooks/9781316645826.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

The Dilemma of the Commoners

Author

Listed:
  • De Moor,Tine

Abstract

One of the classic problems in social science is known as 'the dilemma of the commons', in which land, water, and other resources held jointly by social or economic segments tend to be depleted sooner and to a greater extent than privately held assets. During the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, many aspects of western European society changed fundamentally, including the abolition of common-property rights, which in itself was related to social and economic shifts in that same society. This book intends to put the debate on commons, commoners, and the disappearance of both throughout early modern and modern northwestern Europe in a new light, through new approaches and innovative methodologies. Tine De Moor aims to link the historical debate about the long-term evolution of commons to the present-day debates on common-pool resources, as well as touching upon various disciplines within the social sciences that work on commons issues.

Suggested Citation

  • De Moor,Tine, 2017. "The Dilemma of the Commoners," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781316645826.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:cbooks:9781316645826
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nicole Rogge & Insa Theesfeld & Carola Strassner, 2018. "Social Sustainability through Social Interaction—A National Survey on Community Gardens in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Eva Vriens & Tine De Moor, 2020. "Mutuals on the Move: Exclusion Processes in the Welfare State and the Rediscovery of Mutualism," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 225-237.
    3. José Nederhand & Erik-Hans Klijn & Martijn Steen & Mark Twist, 2019. "The governance of self-organization: Which governance strategy do policy officials and citizens prefer?," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 52(2), pages 233-253, June.
    4. Anders Forsman & Tine De Moor & René van Weeren & Mike Farjam & Molood Ale Ebrahim Dehkordi & Amineh Ghorbani & Giangiacomo Bravo, 2021. "Comparisons of historical Dutch commons inform about the long-term dynamics of social-ecological systems," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(8), pages 1-18, August.
    5. Vittorio Tigrino, 2015. "Risorse collettive e comunit? locali: un approccio storico," ECONOMIA E SOCIET? REGIONALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(3), pages 23-44.
    6. Matteo Di Tullio, 2018. "Cooperating in time of crisis: war, commons, and inequality in Renaissance Lombardy," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 71(1), pages 82-105, February.
    7. Berge, Erling, 2016. "Of urban commons," CLTS Working Papers 4/16, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Centre for Land Tenure Studies, revised 21 Oct 2019.
    8. Alisia Tognon & Nicola Martellozzo & Alessandro Gretter, 2023. "Collective Properties of Trentino: From Traditional Competences to Modern Solution Providers," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:cbooks:9781316645826. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ruth Austin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.