IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zib/zbngwk/v4y2020i2p39-43.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing Guidelines For Environmental Impact Assessment Of Kashmir Underpass Project In Faisalabad

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Aurangzaib

    (Department of Structures and Environmental Engineering, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan)

  • Shahbaz Nasir Khan

    (Department of Structures and Environmental Engineering, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan)

  • Muhammad Touseef

    (Department of Structures and Environmental Engineering, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan)

  • Abdul Nasir

    (Department of Structures and Environmental Engineering, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan)

Abstract

Road development projects are important as they provide economical, political and social benefits but delays can occur. EIA is conducted for every project as required by the Environmental Protection Act of 1997 and the Environmental Policy of Pakistan for the purpose of ensuring mitigation of environmental impacts due to project activities. The Kashmir Underpass project in Faisalabad is assigned to FDA, for the purpose of satisfying growing need of traffic load due to population increase in surrounding areas in newly developed societies. This research examines the different factors of project affecting the environment. Questionnaire approach was utilized to gain insights of environmental impacts due to the project. Results showed that 93% of respondents didn’t knew about EIA and why it is necessary. Respondents were facing impacts from dust particles, noise, traffic, business loss etc. These impacts were analyzed and guidelines were developed for EIA of Kashmir Underpass Project.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Aurangzaib & Shahbaz Nasir Khan & Muhammad Touseef & Abdul Nasir, 2020. "Developing Guidelines For Environmental Impact Assessment Of Kashmir Underpass Project In Faisalabad," Engineering Heritage Journal (GWK), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 4(2), pages 39-43:4, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:zib:zbngwk:v:4:y:2020:i:2:p:39-43
    DOI: 10.26480/gwk.02.2020.39.43
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://enggheritage.com/download/14150/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26480/gwk.02.2020.39.43?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Torben Holvad & John Preston, 2005. "Road Transport Investment Projects and Additional Economic Benefits," ERSA conference papers ersa05p522, European Regional Science Association.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kanemoto, Yoshitsugu, 2013. "Evaluating benefits of transportation in models of new economic geography," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 2(2), pages 53-62.
    2. Meijers, Evert & Hoekstra, Joris & Leijten, Martijn & Louw, Erik & Spaans, Marjolein, 2012. "Connecting the periphery: distributive effects of new infrastructure," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 187-198.
    3. Gwilliam, Ken, 2008. "A review of issues in transit economics," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 4-22, January.
    4. Bogdański Marcin, 2016. "Influence of the A2 motorway on the economic development at local level," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 32(32), pages 49-59, June.
    5. Margarete Czerny & Klaus S. Friesenbichler & Daniela Kletzan & Kurt Kratena & Wilfried Puwein & Michael Weingärtler, 2006. "Teilstudie 10: Produktivitätssteigernde Infrastrukturinvestitionen," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 27449, April.
    6. Louw, Erik & Leijten, Martijn & Meijers, Evert, 2013. "Changes subsequent to infrastructure investments: Forecasts, expectations and ex-post situation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 107-117.
    7. repec:mul:je8794:doi:10.1429/34355:y:2011:i:1:p:125 is not listed on IDEAS

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zib:zbngwk:v:4:y:2020:i:2:p:39-43. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Zibeline International Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://enggheritage.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.