IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/187691.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychological distress among re-education through labour camp detainees in Guangxi Autonomous Region, China

Author

Listed:
  • Yap, Lorraine
  • Shu, Su
  • Zhang, Lei
  • Liu, Wei
  • Chen, Yi
  • Wu, Zunyou
  • Li, Jianghong
  • Wand, Handan
  • Donovan, Basil
  • Butler, Tony

Abstract

[Background:] There is currently no information about the prevalence of, and factors contributing to psychological distress experienced by re-education through labour camp detainees in China. [Methods:] A cross-sectional face-to-face survey was conducted in three labour camps in Guangxi, China. The questionnaire covered socio-demographic characteristics; sexually transmissible infections (STIs); drug use; psychological distress (K-10); and health service usage and access inside the labour camps. K-10 scores were categorised as ≤30 (low to moderate distress) and >30 or more (highly distressed). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models identified factors independently associated with high K-10 scores for men and women separately. [Results:] In total, 755 detainees, 576 (76%) men and 179 (24%) women, participated in the health survey. The study found 11.6% men versus 11.2% women detainees experienced high psychological distress, but no significant gender differences were observed (p> 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression showed that multiple physical health problems were significantly associated with high psychological distress among men. [Conclusion:] Drug treatment and forensic mental health services need to be established in detention centres in China to treat more than 10% of detainees with drug use and mental health disorders.

Suggested Citation

  • Yap, Lorraine & Shu, Su & Zhang, Lei & Liu, Wei & Chen, Yi & Wu, Zunyou & Li, Jianghong & Wand, Handan & Donovan, Basil & Butler, Tony, 2017. "Psychological distress among re-education through labour camp detainees in Guangxi Autonomous Region, China," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 26(1), pages 57-65.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:187691
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/187691/1/f-20534-full-text-Yap-et_al-Distress-v2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chaoyang Li & Earl Ford & Guixiang Zhao & Tara Strine & Satvinder Dhingra & Lawrence Barker & Joyce Berry & Ali Mokdad, 2009. "Association between diagnosed diabetes and serious psychological distress among U.S. adults: the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2007," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 54(1), pages 43-51, June.
    2. Jian‐xun Chen & Yuanyuan Ling, 2010. "CEO golden‐mean thinking, ambidextrous orientation and organizational performance in Chinese context," Nankai Business Review International, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 1(4), pages 460-479, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhao Li & Xiaofan Guo & Hongkun Jiang & Guozhe Sun & Yingxian Sun & Maria Roselle Abraham, 2016. "Diagnosed but Not Undiagnosed Diabetes Is Associated with Depression in Rural Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-10, November.
    2. Catherine Chittleborough & Helen Winefield & Tiffany Gill & Carmen Koster & Anne Taylor, 2011. "Age differences in associations between psychological distress and chronic conditions," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 56(1), pages 71-80, February.
    3. Wai Chuen Poon & Osman Mohamad & Wan Fadzilah Wan Yusoff , 2020. "Examining the Antecedents of Ambidextrous Behaviours in Promoting Creativity among SMEs in Malaysia," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 21(3), pages 645-662, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:187691. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.